Disagreeing with facts just makes you look like a crank.SyberCorp wrote:I don't agree entirely. I have many add-ons that are NOT legacy, that STILL have their same menu-based layout that they did prior to FF57 (one example is 1Password).barbaz wrote:6) Unfortunately the old layout is not technically possible in WebExtensions.
https://hackademix.net/2017/11/21/top-i ... ment-38469
Again, I don't agree. I think this was mostly just a choice Giorgio made to redesign the interface, not that he HAD to go the route he went.barbaz wrote:Again, it isn't technically possible in WebExtensions. This was forced on Giorgio.
Giorgio was involved in designing the WebExtensions APIs. He would know if something is not technically possible.
Currently the only added benefits of NoScript 10 are its XSS filter and the ability to match HTTPS only. But as NoScript gets its features back, the old discussions on this subject will apply again - https://forums.informaction.com/viewtop ... =8&t=22001SyberCorp wrote:My initial question is in response to your last statement, about uMatrix being "something entirely different". What do you mean? Both NoScript and uMatrix do exactly the same things - just different looking interfaces (in my opinion, uMatrix is ostensibly more confusing but is actually much more logical and friendly once you spend a few minutes with it).Pansa wrote:I looked into umatrix, and that imho is something entirely different. And I'm glad fine specific domain control is properly back.