NoScript surrogates vs Greasemonkey?

General discussion about the NoScript extension for Firefox
Post Reply
blowtorch
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:31 am

NoScript surrogates vs Greasemonkey?

Post by blowtorch » Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:42 am

Thrawn wrote:Found this when searching for what the web had to say about NoScript surrogates vs Greasemonkey.

Hey Thrawn, I'm interested in this comparison as well (I posted a related topic here). Did you find anything interesting in this regard?
Last edited by blowtorch on Sat Dec 26, 2015 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0

barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 9873
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: NoScript surrogates vs Greasemonkey?

Post by barbaz » Fri Dec 25, 2015 3:54 pm

Split to a new thread. (Feel free to change the topic title if you want)

related: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=18988
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-

blowtorch
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:31 am

Re: NoScript surrogates vs Greasemonkey?

Post by blowtorch » Sat Dec 26, 2015 12:21 am

Thanks for digging that one up, barbaz. I see that the XHR issue has already been mentioned there.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0

Post Reply