NoScript and ZoneAlarm ForceField conflict

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
pcgeek

NoScript and ZoneAlarm ForceField conflict

Post by pcgeek »

I have heard of someone using NoScript together with ZoneAlarm ForceField (a browser sandbox program) encounter conflicts.
Because I would like to use both, wondering is there any solution to this issue? :?:
Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U; zh-tw) Presto/2.1.1
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: NoScript and ZoneAlarm ForceField conflict

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Not sure, I have not used that sandbox solution, but hopefully someone knows and can provide the feedback.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 AdblockPlus/1.0.1 NoScript/1.9.1.91 RequestPolicy/0.5.4 FirePHP/0.2.4
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: NoScript and ZoneAlarm ForceField conflict

Post by Tom T. »

pcgeek wrote:I have heard of someone using NoScript together with ZoneAlarm ForceField (a browser sandbox program) encounter conflicts.
Because I would like to use both, wondering is there any solution to this issue? :?:
Not familiar with ForceField either, but I have been using NS, the ZoneAlarm Free Home Firewall, and Sandboxie (a different browser sandbox program) for several years, and they all play together nicely. Note: If you want your newly-bookmarked pages or your NS Whitelist additions to be saved permanently outside the present sandbox, you can allow this through the Sandboxie UI and/or its Configuration menu.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
Post Reply