bad sites

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
Ace

bad sites

Post by Ace »

Noscript is usually good at protecting me but I accidentally mistyped and went to youtube.cm and avast threw a fit about a virus from viralvideos.org even with noscript enabled. I dunno if noscript could block a thing like that but I just wanted to give a heads up
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: bad sites

Post by Tom T. »

NoScript is not an anti-virus program per se, as there are other ways of delivering virus payloads than through active scripting. Both are vital parts of your defense. Thanks for sharing.
Last edited by Tom T. on Fri Apr 10, 2009 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: grammar
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US and very good at it, so please write properly; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 which is much better than 3.x
Alan Baxter
Ambassador
Posts: 1586
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:47 am
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: bad sites

Post by Alan Baxter »

It looks like the Avast Network Shield blocked 119.82.30.245/glitterr.php. At least that's what the On-Access Protection Control panel reports. Avast also reports that 119.82.30.245 is a malicious web site if I try to get a report on it with whois.domaintools.com.

I suppose NoScript would protect you if it tried to attack with JavaScript.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: bad sites

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

Also keep in mind that avast! network shield actually monitors the packets and this means it will see the potentially "bad" site while its in transit to be stopped by NoScript on the user side, so it might have a slight head start but you are fine as long as its something that is blocked by the function of NoScript, even though as pointed out, its not an antivirus program.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 FirePHP/0.2.4
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9454
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: bad sites

Post by Giorgio Maone »

GµårÐïåñ wrote:Also keep in mind that avast! network shield actually monitors the packets and this means it will see the potentially "bad" site while its in transit to be stopped by NoScript on the user side, so it might have a slight head start but you are fine as long as its something that is blocked by the function of NoScript, even though as pointed out, its not an antivirus program.
What he said. :ugeek:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Post Reply