web bugs

Ask for help about NoScript, no registration needed to post
catrina

web bugs

Post by catrina »

In NoScript Options, on the Untrusted tab, I have Forbid "web bugs" checked. My question is why do web bugs still show up on pages which i haven't marked as trusted or have marked as untrusted? What i'm doing wrong since the web bugs are still embedded on many web sites. What am i not understanding?

Appreciate your efforts & the sharing of your knowledge,
Catrina
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9454
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: web bugs

Post by Giorgio Maone »

NoScript blocks a very specific kind of web bugs, i.e. images contained inside <NOSCRIPT> elements.
Anyway, since web bugs are by definition "invisible background requests to 3rd party sites", how do they "show up"?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Catrina

Re: web bugs

Post by Catrina »

Thanks for the explanation. I see there's much more reading ahead for me!

As for the question regarding "invisible background requests to 3rd party sites", how do they "show up", the answer is from using the Add-on, "Ghostery", v 1.3.9. According to the info from Ghostery:
"Ghostery alerts you when you visit a web site that has web bugs on it. Web bugs are hidden scripts that track your behavior and notifies you about the invisible web elements contained in the current page. Including web bugs, javascript libraries, etc."

This is how i noticed the web bugs. It's much easier than searching through the media list in the page info.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: web bugs

Post by Tom T. »

IIRC, an early and simple use of web bugs, still prevalent, was the insertion of a one-pixel clear gif image. Its presence on the page made a call to its source, effectively telling the source that you have been there (tracking you).

I use AdBlock original, and pretty much block images on *all* sites where I'm concerned about web bugs. You'd be amazed at how much simpler Yahoo mail is to read and navigate without the annoying pics. If all images are blocked, then this type of web bug should be blocked as well. Yes, I've seen them in the AdBlock list on the page, or in the page source code.

Just for fun, I just added *.clear.gif to the AdBlock filter list. Might help. GL!
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20
catrina

Re: web bugs

Post by catrina »

Thanks Tom. I'm using Adblock & have added "*.clear.gif" to the filter list. It does help! I appreciate your input because i didn't realize it could be that easy.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7
Alan Baxter
Ambassador
Posts: 1586
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:47 am
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: web bugs

Post by Alan Baxter »

catrina wrote:Thanks Tom. I'm using Adblock & have added "*.clear.gif" to the filter list. It does help! I appreciate your input because i didn't realize it could be that easy.
Hi, catrina. I'm using Adblock Plus instead of Adblock, which hasn't been supported for years. The EasyPrivacy filter set subscription for Adblock Plus does a bang-up job on many web bugs and all sorts of other tracking devices.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: web bugs

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

I agree with Alan, use Adblock Plus and the filter sets are pretty good too. In addition, remember that although setting that filter might work on the majority, they don't have to all call it the same thing, so you may not catch everyone with that. That will catch anyone using that naming convention. In fact one of the things many developers do to avoid being filtered is to change names and conventions frankly. :ugeek: There is nothing preventing one from calling it partypooper.png :lol: Good luck.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7
Post Reply