Page 1 of 1

big hammer

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:13 pm
by roashru
more people should know about this web browser extension. no need for adblock. worth money contribute.

Re: big hammer

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:22 pm
by yes_noscript
Thats wrong.
NoScript isnt a adblocker

Re: big hammer

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:15 pm
by barbaz
roashru wrote:worth money contribute.
Speaking on behalf of Giorgio, thank you for your donation! Image
roashru wrote:more people should know about this web browser extension.
Probably it's not publicised more because it's still in alpha state.
yes_noscript wrote:NoScript isnt a adblocker
+1. Ad blocking is just a side effect of the security. It only works because most ads depend on active content.

Re: big hammer

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:32 pm
by jawz101
if NoScript worked on Android I'd uninstall a few add-ons (uBO and Decentraleyes at least). Since most of what is blocked with lists is taken care of by blocking 3rd party scripts. If I had an option to temporarily allow 1st party scripts by default the mobile client would be suitable.

Also, I don't think the options for switching between a blacklist/whitelist in the mobile client actually work, fwiw.

At this point I'm skeptical the mobile client will ever get touched again.

Re: big hammer

Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:26 am
by Thrawn
jawz101 wrote: At this point I'm skeptical the mobile client will ever get touched again.
The transition to WebExtensions (currently in progress) will probably handle it, actually.