big hammer

Android-specific support, bug reports and feature requests.
Post Reply
roashru
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:01 pm

big hammer

Post by roashru » Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:13 pm

more people should know about this web browser extension. no need for adblock. worth money contribute.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0

yes_noscript

Re: big hammer

Post by yes_noscript » Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:22 pm

Thats wrong.
NoScript isnt a adblocker
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:45.9) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/3.2 Firefox/45.9 PaleMoon/27.3.0

barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 9280
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: big hammer

Post by barbaz » Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:15 pm

roashru wrote:worth money contribute.
Speaking on behalf of Giorgio, thank you for your donation! Image
roashru wrote:more people should know about this web browser extension.
Probably it's not publicised more because it's still in alpha state.
yes_noscript wrote:NoScript isnt a adblocker
+1. Ad blocking is just a side effect of the security. It only works because most ads depend on active content.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-

jawz101
Senior Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:13 pm

Re: big hammer

Post by jawz101 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:32 pm

if NoScript worked on Android I'd uninstall a few add-ons (uBO and Decentraleyes at least). Since most of what is blocked with lists is taken care of by blocking 3rd party scripts. If I had an option to temporarily allow 1st party scripts by default the mobile client would be suitable.

Also, I don't think the options for switching between a blacklist/whitelist in the mobile client actually work, fwiw.

At this point I'm skeptical the mobile client will ever get touched again.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/54.0

User avatar
Thrawn
Senior Member
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: big hammer

Post by Thrawn » Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:26 am

jawz101 wrote: At this point I'm skeptical the mobile client will ever get touched again.
The transition to WebExtensions (currently in progress) will probably handle it, actually.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0

Post Reply