big hammer

Development discussion and bugs related to NoScript 3 for Mobile (Android and Maemo) devices, AKA NoScript Anywhere (NSA).

big hammer

Postby roashru » Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:13 pm

more people should know about this web browser extension. no need for adblock. worth money contribute.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 5:01 pm

Re: big hammer

Postby yes_noscript » Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:22 pm

Thats wrong.
NoScript isnt a adblocker
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:45.9) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/3.2 Firefox/45.9 PaleMoon/27.3.0
Senior Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:52 pm

Re: big hammer

Postby barbaz » Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:15 pm

roashru wrote:worth money contribute.

Speaking on behalf of Giorgio, thank you for your donation! Image

roashru wrote:more people should know about this web browser extension.

Probably it's not publicised more because it's still in alpha state.

yes_noscript wrote:NoScript isnt a adblocker

+1. Ad blocking is just a side effect of the security. It only works because most ads depend on active content.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
Board search is currently partially broken:
Workaround: use your favorite search engine, add to your query
Senior Member
Posts: 7989
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: big hammer

Postby jawz101 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:32 pm

if NoScript worked on Android I'd uninstall a few add-ons (uBO and Decentraleyes at least). Since most of what is blocked with lists is taken care of by blocking 3rd party scripts. If I had an option to temporarily allow 1st party scripts by default the mobile client would be suitable.

Also, I don't think the options for switching between a blacklist/whitelist in the mobile client actually work, fwiw.

At this point I'm skeptical the mobile client will ever get touched again.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/54.0
Senior Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:13 pm

Re: big hammer

Postby Thrawn » Thu Aug 03, 2017 5:26 am

jawz101 wrote:At this point I'm skeptical the mobile client will ever get touched again.

The transition to WebExtensions (currently in progress) will probably handle it, actually.
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
User avatar
Senior Member
Posts: 3097
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia

Return to NoScript Mobile

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest