ABE selectively allow google.com?

Discussions about the Application Boundaries Enforcer (ABE) module
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9454
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: ABE selectively allow google.com?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

GµårÐïåñ wrote:Yes that would be valid and yes you can use multiple sites in the same rule, in fact for performance I would think it would be preferred.
Correct on both point. After all ABE starts to be understood :D
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: ABE selectively allow google.com?

Post by Tom T. »

Giorgio Maone wrote:... After all ABE starts to be understood :D
Give it time, Giorgio. Rome wasn't built in a day, you know! :D
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
User avatar
GµårÐïåñ
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
Location: PST - USA
Contact:

Re: ABE selectively allow google.com?

Post by GµårÐïåñ »

No, it took two days :lol:
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
essex boy

Re: ABE selectively allow google.com?

Post by essex boy »

Cheers to the man for the rule.
Don't be thinking I wanted to block google ads from your own site. It was the easiest example I could find nice an quick to test the dud rule.

Got no experience with all this web 2.0 stuff cause I only ever used terminal for browsing and corresponding. Thats how I learned at college from me friends and I never had no need for pictures and music coming via a computer etc.
So this FireFox is new too for me. And I don't like the vibe of knowing all these scripts are all just waiting to run, just because a geezer wants to transact some corresponding, you know what I mean.

Here's me abe user rule now
Site *.googlesyndication.com googlesyndication.com
Accept from mail.google.com noscript.net
Deny
Your ever in Woodford, specially South, we've got the good Italian restaurants no question.
Cheers again
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11
Tom T.
Field Marshal
Posts: 3620
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:58 am

Re: ABE selectively allow google.com?

Post by Tom T. »

@Giorgio:
essex boy wrote: Here's me abe user rule now
Site *.googlesyndication.com googlesyndication.com
Accept from mail.google.com noscript.net
Deny
Confirming that as in the above example, the home sites as well can all be on one line, separated by a single space?
My example had the home sites each on a separate line:

Code: Select all

  Site *.googlesyndication.com googlesyndication.com
    Accept from noscript.net
    Accept from flashgot.net
    Accept from maone.net
    Accept from informaction.com
    Deny
... and was confirmed as correct without comment as to whether "Accept from" could be followed by multiple space-delimited sites. Please confirm -- certainly faster and easier.

Code: Select all

  Site *.googlesyndication.com googlesyndication.com
    Accept from noscript.net flashgot.net maone.net informaction.com
    Deny
Thanks.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US at an expert level; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 diehard
User avatar
Giorgio Maone
Site Admin
Posts: 9454
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:22 pm
Location: Palermo - Italy
Contact:

Re: ABE selectively allow google.com?

Post by Giorgio Maone »

Tom T. wrote:Please confirm -- certainly faster and easier.

Code: Select all

  Site *.googlesyndication.com googlesyndication.com
    Accept from noscript.net flashgot.net maone.net informaction.com
[/quote]
Yes, confirmed. You can put any number of patterns both in the "Site" and in the "from" clause, space separated, and it is both easier and more efficient.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Post Reply