uBlock can block (3rd party) scripts, no need to use uMatrix.4td8s wrote:in the meantime, I am temporarily using uMatrix (which is webext ready) with the 1st Firefox 57 candidate build that has recently came out.
hopefully a webext ready version of Noscript will be available by this coming veterans day weekend.
uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173
uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Re: Firefox 57 and NoScript
That depends on what level of control you want. uMatrix has its place.mooms wrote: uBlock can block (3rd party) scripts, no need to use uMatrix.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Re: uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173
Actually, at least for how I use µMatrix, uBlock Origin probably could replace it in theory. But I prefer µMatrix's UI for some stuff.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
Re: uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173
uMatrix is much more configurable than uBlock, and its behavior (default deny for most things) is more similar to that of NoScript.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0