uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173

General discussion about web technology.
Post Reply
mooms
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:39 am

uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173

Post by mooms » Wed Nov 08, 2017 10:53 pm

4td8s wrote:in the meantime, I am temporarily using uMatrix (which is webext ready) with the 1st Firefox 57 candidate build that has recently came out.
hopefully a webext ready version of Noscript will be available by this coming veterans day weekend.
uBlock can block (3rd party) scripts, no need to use uMatrix.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0

User avatar
Thrawn
Senior Member
Posts: 3106
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:46 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Firefox 57 and NoScript

Post by Thrawn » Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:02 pm

mooms wrote: uBlock can block (3rd party) scripts, no need to use uMatrix.
That depends on what level of control you want. uMatrix has its place.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.

True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0

barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 9280
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173

Post by barbaz » Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:44 pm

Actually, at least for how I use µMatrix, uBlock Origin probably could replace it in theory. But I prefer µMatrix's UI for some stuff.
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-

frankie
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:09 pm

Re: uBO/µMatrix discussion split from t=23173

Post by frankie » Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:50 pm

uMatrix is much more configurable than uBlock, and its behavior (default deny for most things) is more similar to that of NoScript.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0

Post Reply