[feature request] Allow globally this tab only
[feature request] Allow globally this tab only
I generally use quite a few tabs & windows. While I almost never want to actually globally allow scripts, there are times when I desire to allow them globally just for one tab. It is possible to simulate this by disabling "Automatically reload affected pages when permissions change", allowing globally, and then only operating on a single tab. However, there are times when it is helpful to be able to refer to other tabs in dealing with whatever site it is for which I enabled scripts globally. To do so it is necessary to keep switching back and forth from having scripts enabled globally and having them disabled. Having the option to allow globally for a single tab would make it quite a bit easier to do this and prevent the possibility of acting in either the tab in which it is desired to have scripts globally enabled or the ones in which normal operation is desired when the configuration is set for the other.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
Agreed.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120713 Firefox/15.0a2 SeaMonkey/2.12a2
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
So if you a link opens in a new tab (e.g. because you middleclicked it) JS would not be allowed anymore? The same for pop-up windows?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0
- GµårÐïåñ
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 3365
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:19 am
- Location: PST - USA
- Contact:
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
I am with d on this, it has the potential to be as useless as the temp-allow all on this page. For different reasons but still.
~.:[ Lï£ê ï§ å Lêmðñ åñÐ Ì Wåñ† M¥ Mðñê¥ ßå¢k ]:.~
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
________________ .: [ Major Mike's ] :. ________________
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
Lots of talk lately about localised global allow (if that makes sense). I guess that's a consequence of growing site complexity. But it has as many problems as ever; in fact, more, because the longer the list of dependencies, the bigger the impact of writing a blank cheque (or check).
I still suggest that those who want this take a look at Tab Permissions - although I don't endorse the 'agree to everything in advance' approach.
I still suggest that those who want this take a look at Tab Permissions - although I don't endorse the 'agree to everything in advance' approach.
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-gb; GT-S5570 Build/FROYO) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
Well if it is only done on a per tab, or tab & child basis, that is still going to be safer then Allow Globally.
I do it now, from time to time.
I'll go to a site I consider "safe", but also know that I will need a lot of Temp Allow's before it works correctly, so I Allow Global, do what I need to do, then revoke Allow Global. During that time, or if I forget to revoke ... A single tab/children would be better in that respect.
(Now theoretically maybe I should have whitelisted particular domains, but I typically don't whitelist anything.)
I do it now, from time to time.
I'll go to a site I consider "safe", but also know that I will need a lot of Temp Allow's before it works correctly, so I Allow Global, do what I need to do, then revoke Allow Global. During that time, or if I forget to revoke ... A single tab/children would be better in that respect.
(Now theoretically maybe I should have whitelisted particular domains, but I typically don't whitelist anything.)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120714 Firefox/15.0a2 SeaMonkey/2.12a2
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
Huh?therube wrote: I'll go to a site I consider "safe", but also know that I will need a lot of Temp Allow's before it works correctly, so I Allow Global, do what I need to do, then revoke Allow Global. During that time, or if I forget to revoke ... A single tab/children would be better in that respect.
(Now theoretically maybe I should have whitelisted particular domains, but I typically don't whitelist anything.)
You're not willing to persistently whitelist a site, but to get similar convenience, you're willing to allow scripts globally? Do you trust the site, or not?
I don't get it...
This is basically the same as http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8309
======
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Thrawn
------------
Religion is not the opium of the masses. Daily life is the opium of the masses.
True religion, which dares to acknowledge death and challenge the way we live, is an attempt to wake up.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0.1
Re: [feature request] Allow globally this tab only
> You're not willing to persistently whitelist a site
Right.
> but to get similar convenience, you're willing to allow scripts globally?
Right.
It is rare that I do that, but I do from time to time.
> Do you trust the site, or not?
I trust no one.
> This is basically the same as http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8309
Not really. Similar.
This is a request to have Allow Global only affect a single tab (with perhaps children too).
The other is why a single Temporarily Allow All doesn't "TAA" (where they are expecting it to act more like an Allow Global). (Now the conversation may have morphed, but ...)
As the OP described, while this is essentially like Allow Globally (without global refresh), it is nonetheless safer (IMO) because other/non-child windows would not be affected (Allowed Globally). And if you were to forget to revoke, there is only one (starting) avenue (window) for Allow Global to affect, rather then ALL windows.
Right.
> but to get similar convenience, you're willing to allow scripts globally?
Right.
It is rare that I do that, but I do from time to time.
> Do you trust the site, or not?
I trust no one.
> This is basically the same as http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=8309
Not really. Similar.
This is a request to have Allow Global only affect a single tab (with perhaps children too).
The other is why a single Temporarily Allow All doesn't "TAA" (where they are expecting it to act more like an Allow Global). (Now the conversation may have morphed, but ...)
As the OP described, while this is essentially like Allow Globally (without global refresh), it is nonetheless safer (IMO) because other/non-child windows would not be affected (Allowed Globally). And if you were to forget to revoke, there is only one (starting) avenue (window) for Allow Global to affect, rather then ALL windows.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball NoScript FlashGot AdblockPlus
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/16.0 Firefox/16.0 SeaMonkey/2.13a2