.bmoattachments.org wants an "OK" for each attachment

[therube]

.bmoattachments.org wants an "OK" for each attachment?

https://bug1485145.bmoattachments.org/a ... id=9002910
https://bug1485145.bmoattachments.org/a ... id=9002911


All "permissions" (is that what you call it?) for bmoattachments.org look to be allowed (by default).
I'm not even sure why I'm even getting a placeholder?


10.1.9rc1

[therube]

I'm not even sure why I'm even getting a placeholder?

That is, it seems, because mozilla.org is not allowed.
But what does mozilla.org have to do with bmoattachments.org?

It would seem to me, that the placeholder, or not, would depending on whether bmoattachments.org is Allowed or not?

[therube]

URL: https://openload.co/f/8nIS9iZlmtU
(probably "illegal", & proceed with caution, a search for trains led to a YT page, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-Q6ERhevtQ, that led to URL, so there we are...)

Anyhow, allowing openload.co does not get the video playing. [Expected.]
Also does not get you a placeholder (which NoScript 5 does give you). [So not expected.]
You also need to allow oloadcdn.net - which doesn't show until after you've clicked Play (& gotten a popup). [That I'm now thinking is expected.]
(And then once that is "over with", oloadcdn.net no longer appears in dropdown, at that.) [I'll have to double-check that.]

Seems wrong, not getting a placeholder with only openload.com?

[skriptimaahinen]

The placeholder for internal page is new, but seems to honour restrictions as expected. Do not see mozilla.org anywhere.

[therube]

Do not see mozilla.org anywhere.

Right. That is part of the point.

If you want to load those links - without a placeholder, you must have first Allowed mozilla.org.


And I guess I should have mentioned that I do not have mozilla.org Allowed by default.


(I'll look again when I get back to 10.)

[therube]

And now I cannot duplicate it (yet, :evilgril:).
Not in a new Profile, not in the existing Profile.

But it did happen.
Made no sense to me at all when I saw it.
I was moving back & forth between NoScript versions, to see if other bugs I had seen were fixed in later, & then going back to earlier to confirm what I saw with that. Maybe something there?


Let me see what openload does (now)...

Behavior is unchanged.
I "expect" a placeholder with only openload.co allowed (at least NS 5.x gives you a placeholder, so I expect that) so I then question why doesn't NS 10.x give you one?
(Maybe some combination of Custom will give it to you, but I'll be if I can figure it out?)



(Source of the two bmoattachments videos, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1485145.)