10: UI

Bug reports and enhancement requests
jawz101
Senior Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:13 pm

Re: 10: UI

Post by jawz101 »

mutik wrote:@jawz101
I've added second dialog with textual states of each domain, similar to what you proposed in spreasheet. Take a look, might be more to your tastes.

cheers
Looks great. Even if it's a pref to enable/disable descriptions like these, I'm sure a bunch of people would leave them on. I pm'd Giorgio with your example so maybe someday he'll reach out. From the tone of a msg he posted on his Hackademix blog, it looks like he's open for suggestions on the UI. https://hackademix.net/2017/11/21/top-i ... ment-38469
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Mistame
Junior Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:47 pm

Re: 10: UI

Post by Mistame »

Your second example looks like a good way to mix the current setup with your first example. Have it display the icon and text of the current permissions to the left, like it is, but when you click the icon/text, it should drop-down a sort of context menu where you change the permissions directly. The ellipses on the right (...) could be changed to a tool icon (crossed tools icon that's pretty common) or a gear and that would serve as custom. Alternatively, that could be the lock icon that toggles the HTTP/S state with "Custom" being in the aforementioned "context" menu that then slides in an options page (or opens a menu) to customize the permissions for that domain. Not particularly fond the rounded rectangle thing for the icon and permissions, but that's what the default UI does so it works. :)

Edit: On second thought, we really don't need to access custom options from the pop-up menu. If someone wants to fine tune it, they can use the options page for the extension, IMO. Just have "Custom" link at the bottom, under a separator, of the context menu that opens the options panel.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
compass98
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:43 am

Re: 10: UI

Post by compass98 »

I would like to note that this discussion/set of issues is the highest viewed amongst the first 3 pages of threads as of this writing.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/62.0.3202.94 Safari/537.36
barbaz
Senior Member
Posts: 10841
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: 10: UI

Post by barbaz »

I would like to note that this discussion has been very constructive. Let's keep it that way, thanks. 8-)
*Always* check the changelogs BEFORE updating that important software!
-
akaz01
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: 10: UI

Post by akaz01 »

Hi,

if a switch to the old UI is technically difficult,
an option
would help to show only toplevels
like google.com, ioam.de
and do not display the underlying levels.

Most page have many scripts and you have to search through
and scroll, which makes it more easy that you give unintentionally
a permission
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0
Post Reply