InformAction Forums

All seems fine to me. That page creates many script tags dynamically. If javascript is globally disabled for that page, these script tags are not going to be created, and hence won't be reported in NoScript menu. uBO reports more than just script resources, it reports the domain/hostname of whatever...

barbaz wrote:what would I need to change in the µMatrix code to temporarily put HTML5 media back in the image column?

Map the property "media" to "image" in there:
https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix/blob ... ic.js#L449

@gorhill: You're also on Linux, right? Which Chromium version are you using? Yes, on Linux. Chromium 56. Actually the EME issue probably does not apply to Chromium, as the proprietary EME blobs are not available in Chromium. In any case, I have a Google Chrome dev version installed for testing purp...

http://www.ghacks.net/2017/01/29/google-removes-plugin-controls-from-chrome/ https://boingboing.net/2017/01/30/google-quietly-makes-optiona.html I don't like the looks of that... It's fixed: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=686430 I see a checkbox for "Allow sites to play ...

barbaz wrote:@gorhill: Is it intended that fetch() requests are categorised as "other"? Or should they be categorised as XHR?

Should definitely be categorised as "xhr", this was fixed for uBO, forgot to fix for uMatrix.

@gorhill: Is this mozillaZine thread http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=2965271 an official support/discussion thread for uBlock Origin? There is not really any official support thread for uBO. Wherever there is more activity is probably the best candidate for support/discussion...

Basically, if I add a specific local file as a filterset (with or without other filtersets), uBlock Origin disregards some whitelist rules inside the file. As a result, if I visit e.g. https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=21619&start=30, uBlock Origin blocks the images from ...

To be clear, the logger stuff was from a working instance. Ok, at first I thought you were saying the logger was reporting the filter even when not working. If the logger does not report the filter, then I have a pretty good suspicion of where the issue is. For performance consideration, uBO will s...

barbaz wrote:Any of that ring any bells / any suggestions where to look next?

Not sure. You say when the issue occurs the problematic cosmetic filter is still reported in the logger?

Some reckless testing indicates that may not occur unless blocking all websockets by default. Do you see it if you add this filter? *$websocket Ok I see. The filter '*$websocket' or equivalent will force uBO to inject a Content Security Policy header to prevent websocket connections to occur. When ...

about:blank : Unable to run script because scripts are blocked internally. (unknown) I suppose you are using NoScript with uBO? If so, what are NoScript settings for mozillazine.org? Still happening on uBlock Origin 1.9.6, which I updated to yesterday. ... Yes, with SeaMonkey 2.40 it happens as wel...

@gorhill: At what point do generic cosmetic filters kick in? And what does uBlock Origin do when it hits the DOM to determine generic cosmetic filters? Had a weird issue on a page at mozillaZine where I know some links should have been hidden with my rules, usually they are but but they weren't thi...

Just to clarify before trying to put together another formal issue, is this supposed to be a valid uBlock Origin filter or not? ||::1^ Not sure if that filter has always caused this since I've use uBlock Origin or if it's a recent regression I thought such case should never happen, but then you jus...

To reply to this comment in another thread (my emphasis): There are solutions, such as ABE or another extension like RequestPolicy/Policeman/µMatrix, but they take more effort to manage. ABE requires writing an appropriate rule, and the other extensions will make all your permissions site-specific ,...

Issue fixed in uMatrix (and uBlock Origin) with insights from Giorgio Maone regarding Firefox API internals.