InformAction Forums

Does your FF open to about:blank or the new and improved "FF page" that shows you a lot of links to previously visited sites? Apparently quite a few non malicious sites use XSS nowadays, because they just couldn't keep away from it.... So when FF starts and tries to refresh its "hub&q...

That got it! For some reason, under the "trusted" tab, the sites had "script" selected buy grayed out. I had to switch each domain to "custom" and manually check "script" on each one (everything else was already checked). Still not sure why "temporarily ...

It seems like the red/green lock is just more trouble than it's worth. If you trust a site, you trust a site. Why would https and non-https make a difference? Because one sends data encrypted, and the other not. It's basically a method to not accidentally send unencrypted data, when you thought you...

: Bump : I know there's often more than one way to skin a cat but ... Really? No one else has a problem and/or neat solution to this issue? ;) It's a problem that currently is 2 steps away. My current issue is how it deals with subdomains to begin with over 5.x I never used an objective 3rd party l...

Considering that the addon is a one man job, having to deal with Mozilla removing the ability to do it the old way from under him... It's not that it is objectively unintuitive, really. It is mostly unintuitive from the perspective of NS5 user. Not gonna lie, it took me a bit of trying around till I...

That was really painful to read. It's a repetitive problem on the forum. It was (from my perspective) a rather simple question. Open the reply window. Click the noscript button Look at the information there. Are both scripts allowed. Yes, the current behaviour of having to "guess" if that ...

I assume the [...] means a site he is not comfortable disclosing here. Nope. It literally says [...]/ I get the same thing for a newspaper site (nrc.nl). For some reason it's always the same site: This is the full text of the pop-up I keep getting. --- NoScript detected a potential Cross-Site Scrip...

NoScript 10.1.2 on Firefox 57.0 (64-bit) I think it's broken , I can't choose what to trust, it's like it doesn't save it or do anything when I do I think I have to remove the addon because it's useless at the moment, I couldn't even write this because Confirmation code wouldn't show up can I go ba...

Now, NS can work in Private Browsing mode, but, it just cannot seem to remember URLs that are marked as Trusted or Untrusted. This only applies to URLs marked AFTER the update 10.1.2. Before the update the NS button didn't work at all in Private mode, but the rules you set in normal mode did (afaik...

Thanks for the explanation. Please bear with me if I don't understand right away. Maybe I have a glimmer here. Do you mean that "Default" is one setting that applies to every domain? So if I uncheck all the boxes under Default for one domain, then all the boxes will be unchecked for every...

Well of course it remembers, it probably is hidden in your profile somewhere. And you are still not answering the question as I posed it. On this forum, on the composer page.... Do you have BOTH informaction AND google allowed. I am at this point not interested in what other pages do. This forum de...

Hello, Recently updated to Quantum and Noscript is have serious issues. Every time I allow a script (either Trusted or Temporary) and attempt to reload page, the setting automatically reverts back to the prior Default setting. Doesn't seem to matter which page I'm at. Any ideas? Site is probably ht...

it also means you gave [...] script permissions to begin with, because if it weren't allowed to run scripts, it wouldn't be allowed to cross-script to begin with. Nope, XSS can happen without the malicious site being Allowed. IIRC NoScript Classic actually uses a stricter XSS filter for requests or...