Search found 195 matches
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:57 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
I hadn't seen your post on what to do with UNION bank yet, but just sort of formulated what it should be from what you did before.... Since ABE is working for these websites presumably maybe it would be okay to stay with this version for the sake of whatever other improvement there were.... What do ...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:53 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
Okay I changed UNION Bank from: Site .sso.unionbank.com .bankingsso.unionbank.com Accept from .unionbank.com Deny INCLUSION Accept from https://palemoon.start.me/* .unionbank.com Deny which renders the about:blank page To: Site .sso.unionbank.com .bankingsso.unionbank.com Accept from .unionbank.com ...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:43 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
Decided to check other bank sites that have ABE rule-sets: I'm having the same problem with Union Bank: Site .sso.unionbank.com .bankingsso.unionbank.com Accept from .unionbank.com Deny INCLUSION Accept from https://palemoon.start.me/* .unionbank.com Deny renders the "about"blank" pag...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:27 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
Okay that worked http://i.psyche.me/thumbs_up.gif ... so is ABE not working correctly in this 5.1.5 version? Would it be better to return to 5.0.6 (which is what is listed as the most current version on the Pale Moon add-on page for NoScript)? Or are the other changes between 5.0.6 worth using 5.1.5?
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:16 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
I commented the top rule-set in ABE and got this in the web console: [ABE] < .citi.com> Deny INCLUSION on {GET https://online.citi.com/US/JPS/portal/Index.do?Promo_ID=SPBL <<< https://palemoon.start.me/p/3g6DnO/my-start-page - undefined} CITIBANK rule: Site .citi.com Accept from .citi.com moz-nullpr...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:08 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
I cleared the web console and then clicked on the Citibank log-in link and got this result in the web console: [ABE] < .online.citi.com> Deny INCLUSION on {GET https://online.citi.com/US/JPS/portal/Index.do?Promo_ID=SPBL <<< https://palemoon.start.me/p/3g6DnO/my-start-page - undefined} CITIBANK rule...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:57 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
Same problem
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:44 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
Okay, I've got 5.1.5 and I still have the problem unless I disable ABE (btw, I am now able to modify ABE however in this version). This is what I had in ABE of which you had helped me with in the past: Site .online.citi.com Accept from .citi.com Deny INC Accept from .citi.com https://start.me/* http...
- Thu Dec 07, 2017 11:58 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
Since it worked for you I tested in fresh profile and 5.1.8.1 worked so I figured something in about:config has to be the issue. Since ABE is about the only profile settings involving Citibank that could be a possible problem ---- I've found that if I disable ABE for Citibank the log-in page works. ...
- Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:22 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
Re: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
No just clicking on the log-in link causes this. Here is the URL: https://online.citi.com/US/JPS/portal/Index.do?Promo_ID=SPBL (I had to disable NoScript to get this otherwise I'd get the "about:blank" in the address bar and the tab is identified as a "New Tab".) So you should ge...
- Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:10 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
- Replies: 31
- Views: 14636
NoScript 5.1.8.1 broke website
I thought I'd update NoScript from 5.0.6 to 5.1.8.1 and since then the Citibank log-in page give me "about:blank" in the address bar. If I disable NoScript then the log-in page works.
Should I just go back to 5.0.6?
Should I just go back to 5.0.6?
- Fri Nov 17, 2017 5:38 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScript disabled
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4508
Re: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScript disabled
^ Works, no need to whitelist
- Fri Nov 17, 2017 5:12 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScript disabled
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4508
Re: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScrit disabled
Added the following to myfilters:
and I get a black video which does not play. Going back to using the whitelist and it plays.
Am I missing something?
Code: Select all
||cdn.krxd.net^$script,redirect=noopjs,domain=video.foxnews.com
@@||global.fncstatic.com/$script,domain=video.foxnews.com
Am I missing something?
- Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:56 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScript disabled
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4508
Re: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScrit disabled
^ Hmm, I use EasyList and it is current so perhaps it wasn't fixed?
- Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:58 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Unrelated] Video only works with NoScript disabled
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4508
Re: Video only works with NoScrit disabled
Okay in a fresh PM Profile I did the following: Install the current NS release (as suggested). After allowing as many as 4 iterations of permissions to requests in NoScript I was able to get the video to work with the current NS release. So I'm thinking that this same thing would be the case if I re...