InformAction Forums

Started working, not sure why. But apparently solved.

If you are still using WF, 56.2.10, are you able to replicate the following with Matrix (1.3.16) My rules ->import from file: After selecting and opening a given .txt file, Commit button stays greyed out, in other words, nothing happens. (Tested in uM earlier version 1.3.14 same behavior as well.) W...

That link worked for him to install at WF. Thanks.

Had been trying different things, legacy collector highest version is the 5.1.8.4. At your suggestion, advised to get the 5.1.9 directly. If that still doesn't work, you may hear from them directly. Thanks.

Not me, I have no problem installing the 5.1.8.4 to my WF 56.2.10 from this link (and then returning to the 5.1.9), but someone I know elsewhere can't install NS from https://legacycollector.org/firefox-addons/722/noscript-5.1.8.4.xpi Gets the following https://i.postimg.cc/ts6pQb9w/Screen-Shot-2019...

For Waterfox, from https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewMyClient.html

Not good if it allows 1.0. Just set security.tls to from 1 to 3 (security.tls.version.min;3)

Thanks for your feedback on this.

Curious to know how this is playing out here. Full compliance seems to make life very difficult for smallish boards with limited resources.

barbaz wrote:You could assign the site a temporary CUSTOM permission.

That should take care of it. Thanks.

My Trusted does not include font, only script, frame, fetch. As I understand it, font is for remote font, so don't want to permanently add that to trusted -- am I mistaken in thinking that remote font is open to possible exploitation? My assumption for this question is that it is. For any given trus...

Thanks gorhil, added guce.advertising.com guce.advertising.com * allow ` and no longer get the uMatrix block. I think what I meant by "no satisfying solution in sight" had more to do with the underlying issue, which is, as far as I can tell, guce.advertising.com is most likely a tracker, but needs t...

Thanks gorhill for the information on getting through the block, as well as what that textbox below the Hosts Files is for. Mistakenly assumed it was for some kind of whitelist. Btw, here's someone else encountering the same dilemma--with no really satisfying solution in sight. https://www.reddit.co...

Thanks for spending time with this, and your testing. Added * advertising.com * block, but still getting the uMatrix block on login. Without having an actual AOL login (yuck, I rue the day I was forced by Verizon to start using this total AOL crap--never had any real issues with Verizon mail), you w...

I can with high level of confidence tell you that if you globally neuter advertising.com as I do in uBlock rules, you will never suffer anything adverse, but again, that's me. uB0 would simply kill this resource and make it fail silently and that's the end of that. Hmmm, unsure of how to do that wi...

Chances are if you go there and give them the compulsory, yea I got it bluh bluh, they will probably stop doing the redirect but that's just an educated guess. Nope, the redirect doesn't stop, even after agreeing to the new ToU. Goes by very quickly, but, with the scope greenlit, seeing something l...