Search found 2897 matches

by GµårÐïåñ
Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:51 pm
Forum: Security
Topic: Windows leaking IPv6 address
Replies: 1
Views: 88198

Re: Windows leaking IPv6 address

Yes, but you can easily plug it with a small amount of effort. Assuming your ISP is giving you an IPv4 address and not an IPv6 (in which case you are shit out of luck and need it) you can block all IPv6 traffic with several tweaks; each of which works on its own but you can bundle them all to make s...
by GµårÐïåñ
Sun Nov 12, 2017 12:42 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: 0.0.0.0 being treated as LOCAL
Replies: 3
Views: 970

Re: 0.0.0.0 being treated as LOCAL

This is one way to look at it: That link requires login and I don't have one. Can you please quote the relevant part? My sincerest apologies, I was working on a mock up with the Mozilla team, I put the link to that instead of the article, I have corrected it. Damn you copy paste and not looking at ...
by GµårÐïåñ
Sat Nov 11, 2017 10:01 pm
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: 0.0.0.0 being treated as LOCAL
Replies: 3
Views: 970

Re: 0.0.0.0 being treated as LOCAL

In networking 0.0.0.0 is often treated as the ultimate path, meaning in practice it reflects your actual path to the internet, so it can often trigger any LOCAL designation, although I am not sure how specifically it triggers ABE's implementation but thought I share that. This is one way to look at ...
by GµårÐïåñ
Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:43 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?
Replies: 30
Views: 8928

Re: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?

They are very irresponsibly pushing the release despite not being ready and many of the devs not being ready due to lack of proper API or finalized code, but that's Mozilla for you.
by GµårÐïåñ
Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:42 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Sightings
Replies: 153
Views: 357216

Re: NoScript Sightings

Despite their misleading title, they don't actually say what it is. They just dance around it by giving a summary of each browser and throwing in some scattered "data" to use the term loosely and stories about it and bullet points from their feature lists. Anyone reading this wouldn't know more abou...
by GµårÐïåñ
Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:37 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Allow JS from a certain host only on one domain
Replies: 7
Views: 1308

Re: Allow JS from a certain host only on one domain

There you have it. :ugeek: Keep in mind that uMatrix is an extension of uBlock in the sense that it is more of a general blocker of resources than JUST scripts, much like how most of use have and used ReqeustPolicy in conjunction with NoScript to introduce a ACL or Firewall style rule to control dyn...
by GµårÐïåñ
Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:57 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Allow JS from a certain host only on one domain
Replies: 7
Views: 1308

Re: Allow JS from a certain host only on one domain

Yeah, but the OP asked for a GUI - ABE can be accessed through the GUI and is there for exactly this kind of pick and choose customization. Many years ago, you can ask Thrawn, we worked on a GUI driven ABE decisions but quickly became obvious that one size wizarding doesn't fit all and it is best t...
by GµårÐïåñ
Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:00 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Prevent "Mining" :)
Replies: 6
Views: 2115

Re: NoScript Sightings

Should some website also check whether the miner actually works and otherwise intentionally break some functionality to force you enabling it, we could devise some Surrogate Script as a work-around. Thank you my friend for so quickly coming to take a look and dropping some knowledge, appreciate it ...
by GµårÐïåñ
Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:38 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Allow JS from a certain host only on one domain
Replies: 7
Views: 1308

Re: Allow JS from a certain host only on one domain

Sure it does, think ABE.
by GµårÐïåñ
Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:09 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Prevent "Mining" :)
Replies: 6
Views: 2115

Re: NoScript Sightings

NoScript on Pirate Bay forum to disable a bitcoin mining script https://pirates-forum.org/Thread-PIRATE-BAY-OFFICIAL-SITE-MINER They have been mining to make some funds for the site, it's been known for a long time and over at uBlock it was already blocked with a specialized list that also kills ot...
by GµårÐïåñ
Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:57 pm
Forum: Security
Topic: WPA2 has been KRACKed!
Replies: 4
Views: 9363

Re: WPA2 has been KRACKed!

If you get a chance, read the original paper on the vulnerability, it will explain a lot better to read the research itself. If you can't find it, let me know and I will send you the PDF or the link to it.
by GµårÐïåñ
Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:26 pm
Forum: Security
Topic: WPA2 has been KRACKed!
Replies: 4
Views: 9363

Re: WPA2 has been KRACKed!

For all the shade that gets thrown Microsoft's way, they have patched it long ago, only Linux, Android and Apple are still compromised. It sucks though for sure, but it was a only a matter of time after WEP and WPA got so whacked. Keep in mind, don't know if they discuss that, to be honest didn't re...
by GµårÐïåñ
Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:43 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?
Replies: 30
Views: 8928

Re: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?

barbaz wrote:Ok, so you're saying the needed APIs are not only not implemented yet, but still in flux, so it's still too early for my questions to have answers.
Correct. Unfortunately somewhat so.
by GµårÐïåñ
Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:20 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?
Replies: 30
Views: 8928

Re: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?

So is it not actually known yet which of the needed APIs will only be available in Firefox? No, see it this way, you know what API you plan to make, you know what those API require, and you can even preview them but they may not be completed yet, fully available yet, or even fully functional yet. S...
by GµårÐïåñ
Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:06 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?
Replies: 30
Views: 8928

Re: NoScript Webext browser compatibility?

barbaz wrote:... means it's already known which WebExtensions APIs it needs, doesn't it?
Correct, but knowing what you gonna need and actually having it available are two entirely different things my friend.