Search found 931 matches
- Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:13 am
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
Yes I did and I was actually up till 3 AM (as Tom can verify) but I couldn't reproduce the problem. I tried as many variations of the problem as I could conceive but nada. I tried in 3.6pre and 3.5 but I was thinking about trying it with 3.0.11, been working and hadn't had a chance to get to it, wi...
- Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:18 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
Did you get a chance to try it?GµårÐïåñ wrote:Sorry for the delayed response, I will go ahead and drop it in my XP VM and test it at various levels, I am thinking current, current+1 import (x2), and finally x2+import (x3) and get back to you, give me a couple of hours, I just got home.
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:59 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
that's ok, you can always see it working when you start with a new profile. They important thing is that you can repro the bug. Keep a copy of the bad places.sqlite just in case.therube wrote:I was unable to duplicate it working ... BUT ...
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:53 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
You've been unable to duplicate the bug? or duplicate the bookmark working?therube wrote:But I've been unable to duplicate it working since?
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:45 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
yes, I mixed up the nt version, vista is 6.0 Maybe this issue is XP32 only.therube wrote:XP SP3.
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:32 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
FF35 with a LARGE places.sqlite says "Firefox prevented this site from opening 5 pop-up windows." That's great, you've reproduced it, on Vista I presume? So that's the bug, these aren't popups and should never be blocked, certainly not as a function of how many bookmarks you have. It all ...
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:51 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
My "bookmarks" which now Fx calls places have been maintained and growing since Netscape 1.0 and yes I have managed to hold on to it, organize it and keep it this long without losing it and updating the structure as they have changed. However, my places file is only 4.05 MB and apparently...
- Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:23 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
(I'm not understanding "keywords" correctly, as in %s is not being substituted. Nonetheless ...) SeaMonkey 2 (akin to FF 3.5). There seems to be a "firing" issue of sorts. Usually the first one or two clicks of the bookmarklet will only open a subset of the requested sites. One ...
- Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:51 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15180
please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
I’ve encountered a bizarre bug in Firefox 3+ that’s forcing me to stay with Firefox 2. I would like to ask for help in reproducing it, understanding it, getting around it if possible and convincing Mozilla to fix it. Here is an overview: I think almost from the beginning of Firefox it was possible t...
- Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:56 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: shouldn't noscript.net/feed?t=a show all builds?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1876
shouldn't noscript.net/feed?t=a show all builds?
it currently returns just dev same as /feed?t=b
I thought that:
/feed - release
/feed?t=b - dev
/feed?t=a - combined
I thought that:
/feed - release
/feed?t=b - dev
/feed?t=a - combined
- Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:24 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: a few partially allowed icon issues
- Replies: 22
- Views: 16884
Re: a few partially allowed icon issues
I don't follow, for the colorblind it will just stay as it is now, no differentiation, they won't be any worse off.Giorgio Maone wrote:However using different colors is not feasible, because it would hurt accessibility for the color blind.
- Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:25 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: a few partially allowed icon issues
- Replies: 22
- Views: 16884
Re: a few partially allowed icon issues
@ al9_x : Sorry for the late answer. When you posted this topic I had very big fishes to fry (trying to put an ABE stable version out of the door) and I'm not done yet, thanks to the Gecko HTTP request pipeline which makes doing everything right very difficult and hackish. So I mentally marked both...
- Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:39 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: a few partially allowed icon issues
- Replies: 22
- Views: 16884
Re: a few partially allowed icon issues
not the second oneAlan Baxter wrote:Since the bugs occur only in Fx 2
- Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:55 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: a few partially allowed icon issues
- Replies: 22
- Views: 16884
Re: a few partially allowed icon issues
Giorgio or Mods,
This thread was started 11 days ago with two bug reports and a suggestion. Since Giorgio is the sole dev (AFAIK), naturally, they are meant for him. Why does he not reply?
This thread was started 11 days ago with two bug reports and a suggestion. Since Giorgio is the sole dev (AFAIK), naturally, they are meant for him. Why does he not reply?
- Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:24 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: continuous page reloading in FF2 + 1.9.3.6
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5289
Re: continuous page reloading in FF2 + 1.9.3.6
Giorgio Maone wrote:Can you confirm it on latest development build (1.9.3.9)?
fixed in latest (1.9.3.91) (small aside: just curious, why not go to 1.9.3.10 from 1.9.3.9)
could you also look at this