Search found 931 matches
- Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:38 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fx2 post 1.9.5 iframe regression
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16971
Re: Fx2 post 1.9.5 iframe regression
Some weirdness was kind of expected because I noticed a change in how latest Gecko 1.8.x series builds handle request lifecycle and had to add an "Only from cache" restriction to the requests to be blocked in order to block them reliably. I'm investigating how to mitigate the side effects...
- Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:54 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: please update the feed links to https
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4386
Re: please update the feed links to https
The information about release type is already in the combined feed but hidden in the urls, it would be better if it was more clearly marked.GµårÐïåñ wrote:There is a dedicated feed for the betas, use that if you want separation.
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:15 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: please update the feed links to https
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4386
please update the feed links to https
It also would be useful if the combined feed marked the entries as release or beta. The urls do show that, but something more visible would be nice.
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:10 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fx2 post 1.9.5 iframe regression
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16971
Re: Fx2 post 1.9.5 iframe regression
I think you misunderstood, there is no cure.Yes, the error is identical, but the cure doesn't work for me.
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:01 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fx2 post 1.9.5 regression: POSTDATA that has expired
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3071
Fx2 post 1.9.5 regression: POSTDATA that has expired
confirmed on a new profile, Fx2 + NS 1.9.6.8 1) Forbid iframes, apply to trusted sites 2) go to http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/ 3) for expediency allow all this page twice or until everything is allowed 4) (re)load the page after everything is allowed 5) you should get an a Fx "Confirm"...
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:26 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: [RESOLVED] 1.9.6.2 and .6.5 causing "Offline" error message
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9753
Re: 1.9.6.2 and .6.5 causing "Offline" error message
Noticed this thread after I posted a bug. The two issues might be related.
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:20 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fx2 post 1.9.5 iframe regression
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16971
Fx2 post 1.9.5 iframe regression
1) forbid iframes, set no placeholders for untrusted 2) goto http://www.betanews.com/ which contains an ad iframe near the top 3) you will see Fx2 briefly load the "offline mode" error page in the iframe, which is then replaced by placeholder 4) this "offline mode" flashing wasn'...
- Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:46 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9353
Re: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
then you also need to allow gmodules before the frame actually loads. & then you can click on a follower. the iframe loads because you a refreshing the page after allowing gmodules. That is not the scenario I am describing. If you click on the placeholder when everything is already allowed, the...
- Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:25 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9353
Re: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
just some rambling ... needs blogspot.com & google.com. at that point, the frame placeholder loads. then you also need to allow gmodules before the frame actually loads. & then you can click on a follower. (It's time like that that the "i give up" button comes in handy.) Are you s...
- Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:12 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9353
Re: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
What is a "Followers widget iframe"? 1) disable iframes for trusted 2) go to youtube-global.blogspot.com 3) scroll down 4) at the bottom of the right layout column there will be a iframe placeholder with a "Followers" heading 5) activate it, nothing loads it may be that in order...
- Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:49 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9353
Re: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
Can anything be done about the Followers widget iframe? It doesn't load when activated. It is created by a script as are presumably other google widgets/gadgets/webelements so perhaps many of them won't work when activated.Giorgio Maone wrote:Fixed in 1.9.6.2, thank you all.
- Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9353
Re: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
No placeholder in one particular blogspot hosted blog with "forbid iframe" checked. Test case steps to reproduce in NS 1.9.6 This bug was introduced after 1.9.5, where the youtube flash placeholder does appear. Can you reproduce it in any other example? I can't find one. Official YouTube ...
- Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:55 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9353
Re: Flash placeholder missing when iframes forbidden
This bug was introduced after 1.9.5, where the youtube flash placeholder does appear.Grumpy Old Lady wrote:No placeholder in one particular blogspot hosted blog with "forbid iframe" checked.
Test case steps to reproduce in NS 1.9.6
- Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:30 am
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15183
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
unless you want me to create a VM that is 64 bit and that's going to take me MUCH longer to test since I have to build it first. no there is no point in 64. therube and I are both on 32 bit xp sp3 direct (no vm). As I mentioned, the only thing you can do to get closer to our environment is to try o...
- Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:41 am
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
- Replies: 24
- Views: 15183
Re: please help to reproduce Firefox 3+ bug 460880
This one is single core?therube wrote:I was on an AMD Sempron 3000