Search found 68 matches

by jawz101
Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:53 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Suggestion for Close button: change from U+1f5d9 to U+24e7 ⓧ
Replies: 8
Views: 964

Re: Suggestion for Close button: change from U+1f5d9 to U+24

update: you all may want to update. Looks like Giorgio fixed it in today's version 10.1.2
by jawz101
Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:48 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: [RESOLVED] Block all videos from loading
Replies: 4
Views: 700

Re: Block all videos from loading

Thank you, but I think I'm missing something obvious here. When you say click on an icon, these icons are options for individual websites, right? But I want to block all videos from all websites. Is that possible? The confusion is that Default, Trusted, and Untrusted are actually globally set- even...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:33 pm
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: 10: UI
Replies: 19
Views: 7248

Re: UI Feature Request - Classic

PS. Will explore utilizing builtin sidebar to display full NS options. I know web extensions API allows to use it somehow, but never wrote extension in my life so will take few days. My only concern is Firefox for Android wouldn't support sidebar functionality so it may result in more complexity. I...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:23 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Suggestion for Close button: change from U+1f5d9 to U+24e7 ⓧ
Replies: 8
Views: 964

Suggestion for Close button: change from U+1f5d9 to U+24e7 ⓧ

The existing character is unicode 7 http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f5d9/index.htm This character ⓧ is unicode 1.1.0 which seems more compatible http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/24e7/index.htm ... or search for 'X', 'close', or 'cancel' here to see if another looks better h...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:12 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript UI Design proposals
Replies: 18
Views: 3584

Re: NoScript UI Design proposal

The other thing that's confusing is the add-on current behaves as if the checkbox next to Full Domains (www.noscript.net) on this screen was checked. I usually left it unchecked because I typically blocked at the base domain level and didn't get too granular to pick apart how much of a domain I want...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:59 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript UI Design proposals
Replies: 18
Views: 3584

Re: NoScript UI Design proposals?

I've given this a few tries, but I am still totally confused. script object media frame font webgl fetch other The heck is a user supposed to do with all that? I think those various things are way too much for anyone to manage regularly. I think this may help explain the new options. Take a look at...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:37 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript UI Design proposals
Replies: 18
Views: 3584

Re: NoScript UI Design proposals?

Ok. I updated the Google Sheet one last time. I think the first sheet in the Google Sheet makes the most sense. Broke out the customization of Default, Trusted, and untrusted to the Global Options screen so it reduces the tinkering of these settings. A lot of the questions we see are surrounding how...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:16 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: [RESOLVED] Block all videos from loading
Replies: 4
Views: 700

Re: Block all videos from loading

click on an icon and underneath it should show options to uncheck for media, images, and frames. That's usually where those things reside. I mark all obvious third party sites as untrusted and that should take care of it as well.
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:13 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: New options, UI
Replies: 2
Views: 368

Re: New options, UI

I'm not a fan of the hover over, personally. The icons are unintuitive (and an eyesore). My reasoning for not liking the hover-over descriptions is that you can't hover over on Firefox for Android. Then you're left with confusing icons to interpret.
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:11 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: New Noscript Default Options
Replies: 2
Views: 570

Re: New Noscript Default Options

in the least, you'd want scripts to be unticked on the Default setting for NoScript to be called NoScript.
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:49 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript UI Design proposals
Replies: 18
Views: 3584

Re: NoScript UI Design proposals?

errr... it's editable so you can mess it up too I guess
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:43 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript UI Design proposals
Replies: 18
Views: 3584

Re: NoScript UI Design proposals?

I like this mockup https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=23624&p=91735#p91561 ...but took it a bit differently and made a Google Sheet because I just wanted to get the general idea across on a scratchpad https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LaLc11lK1-ymV6g59KLP6wOTwC5brJ3K00OMzkVP4...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:26 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: 10: UI
Replies: 19
Views: 7248

Re: UI Feature Request - Classic

Hi, New popup menu is not entirely intuitive for me. I'd love to see option to switch menu layout from "new" to let's say "classic" which blends nicely with native Firefox dialogs. Made some CSS/HTML tinkering in NS code to show what I have in mind by saying "classic": https://prnt.sc/hdeevr . When...
by jawz101
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:19 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript version 10 settings location
Replies: 2
Views: 1198

Re: NoScript version 10 settings location

Looks like it stores its data in your Firefox profile folder in a SQLite database named storage-sync.sqlite, under the table named content_data, collection_name default/{73a6fe31-595d-460b-a920-fcc0f8843232}... I have another add-on I've used that does the same thing. Basically, it's a bit more diff...
by jawz101
Tue Nov 21, 2017 6:49 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: NoScript UI Design proposals
Replies: 18
Views: 3584

Re: NoScript UI Design proposals?

@barbaz what are your impressions of ScriptSafe https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... lahbdbdgdf
It's a Chrome extension. I've used it in Chrome some to get a similar NoScript experience. I can't say I'm a complete fan but it's a little more descriptive.