InformAction Forums

"cap_x-load": { "message": "x-load", "description": "Capability for file:// documents to load subresources from a different and non descendant directory." }, looked at https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/43635 , but I...

Created Make "Match HTTPS content only" the default for manually added sites issue to track this enhancement.

What do Permissions ans Site access options for NoScript look in chrome://extensions/?id=mhpagngfooodcmpibdanoeelgnpagnjl ? For me that URL doesn't go anywhere, should this be chrome://extensions/?id= doojmbjmlfjjnbmnoijecmcbfeoakpjm for Chrome Web Store version of NoScript? Correct, thanks. I had ...

Version 12.1.1 is causing web pages not to load. It's working fine here. Which pages are not loading? What do Permissions ans Site access options for NoScript look in chrome://extensions/?id=mhpagngfooodcmpibdanoeelgnpagnjl - edited out, wrong URL, should be chrome://extensions/?id=doojmbjmlfjjnbmn...

If you uninstall NoScript (or use the [Remove] button from the AMO page) you will actually loose your settings.

However you can force a reinstall without loosing your settings by using this link: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/down ... 12.1.1.xpi

Does reinstalling it from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... /noscript/ help?

Which version of NoScript is listed in your add-ons manager?

Unfortunately a NoScript 12.0.901 bug causes it not to receive updates on the dev channel. Users on 12.0.901 will be automatically updated to 12.1.1 as soon as it's published on AMO (where it's waiting for review). If you (hopefully) want to stay on the dev channel, please install manually latest de...

Fixed in 12.0.902, thanks.

That was mostly a cosmetic bug, anyway fixed in 12.0.901, which on the other brings a lot of dramatic future-proofing changes from the 12 MV3 branch (including the digit-only versioning): beware and brace!

Sorry for the late answer, but as you've hopefully find by yourself that was very very old code applying to an old old version of Fennec.

posting on behalf of @fatboy, who PMed me that the spam filter does not like this message): It seems to me that UNTRUSTED is not quite what we need. I have roughly the same situation (if I understand correctly). There is a page: https://www.cdek.ru/ru/offices/view/msk205/ On this page, I need to bl...

You can safely ignore any `[Report Only]` line.
They're there to provide NoScript UI with the necessary feedback about page activity which is missing in Manifest V3.

You can explicitly set them as UNTRUSTED. Does it work for you?

Please check 12.0.6 from https://noscript.net/getit/#nonstore-ve ... r-chromium thanks.