InformAction Forums

... is still the case. 2) Depending how "untrusted" the domain is, you might consider not inserting it directly into HTML by concatenation, and instead using: - URL API and the associated URLSearchParams for inserting the domain in the Startpage search URL - .textContent ...

... is still the case. 2) Depending how "untrusted" the domain is, you might consider not inserting it directly into HTML by concatenation, and instead using: - URL API and the associated URLSearchParams for inserting the domain in the Startpage search URL - .textContent ...

... "content/eventsHook.main.js", "content/syncFetchPolicy.js" ] } ], "options_ui": { "page": "ui/options.html", "open_in_tab": true }, "browser_action": { "default_area": "navbar", "default_title": ...

1. html file
https://cloud.disroot.org/s/rTNspos4YmxKWze

2. Maybe change the order of items in the "Noscript blocked object" window?
https://m.freespeech.club//-XPNa6W8.png

fatboy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 4:19 pm Images are base 64.

Do you mean they're data: URLs?

Could please you share the HTML file to check? Thanks!

Windows 7, Fx 115esr, r3dfox 128, NoScript 12.5.904 There is html saved in one file. Images are base 64. I have to allow each image separately in the menu. https://m.freespeech.club//I01ZUcch.png If I click on placeholder, it opens a window with no visible ...

... in file: -> CUSTOM with the tooltip: "Capability for ‹…› directory." More like if you open "file:///home/fatboy/Downloads/somepage.html" and it tries to load anything, even an image, from an unrelated directory (e.g. "file:///home/fatboy/.config/chromium/Avatars/avatar_generic.png"), ...

... in file: -> CUSTOM with the tooltip: "Capability for ‹…› directory." More like if you open "file:///home/fatboy/Downloads/somepage.html" and it tries to load anything, even an image, from an unrelated directory (e.g. "file:///home/fatboy/.config/chromium/Avatars/avatar_generic.png"), ...

If somerandomsite.com and wallstdata.com are allowed to run scripts on a mybroker.com webpage, their scripts run in the context of the mybroker.com webpage , so any "fetch" they initiate would look the same as a fetch initiated by mybroker.com's first-party scripts. What you're describing ...

... Is it because certain elements in DuckDuckGo are just plain HTML? But shouldn’t “Other” settings cover that? Reddit, however, doesn’t load in the same way: https://forum.torproject.org/uploads/default/original/2X/2/2184b146eac8617ddd4e895991d8ae20bc506c07.png ...

Fx/115.18.0 NS/12.1.0.901 Before the "NoScript Blocked Objects" window appears, the "moz-extension://abracadabra/ui/prompt.html" window appears for a fraction of a second — https://m.freespeech.club//_n8euT6-.png . [NoScript](#1,40,40): Prompt data Object { id: 2, features: ...

... unknown to the settings host (e.g. Tor/Mullvad browser), if any x Configurable "lazy_load" capability (see https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5250) x [L10n] Updated fr

... is not allowed in NoScript), & the page comes up - blank. Do the same in SeaMonkey, & the page automatically rolls over to https://html.duckduckgo.com/html. Like, huh? So both Google & DDG searches break on the same day? Disable NoScript Set, javascript.enabled;false - so disabling ...

... & with NoScript 5.1.9, also not getting any blocking with Forbid <FRAME> / Forbid <IFRAME> enabled. Hmm... On here, https://www.w3schools.com/html/tryit.asp?filename=tryhtml_iframe_height_width, appears the content of the frame is blocked, but no placeholder. But that is different from the ...

Fx 115.10esr
NS 11.4.31rc2 (or any other)
New profile.
Unchecked [frame] in Settings
Regardless of script resolution, no placeholders are displayed:
iframe - https://tom--schilling.de/wandern/wande ... 2023-07-17
frame - https://rf.dobrochan.net/
There are no messages in the console.