Search found 370 matches: e10s

Searched query: +e10s

by Giorgio Maone
Thu Sep 05, 2019 11:33 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: Bugs in "Disable restrictions for this tab"
Replies: 11
Views: 2196

Re: Bugs in "Disable restrictions for this tab"

It really looks we need synchronous messaging initiated from content (just like in the e10s API), as I advocated for years (since the Chrome extensions API was initially designed).
by therube
Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:52 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools
Replies: 8
Views: 2188

Re: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools

Some sites (well on one at least), I do get rules.

Code: Select all

# User-defined rules. Feel free to experiment here.

Site .hackademix.net
Anonymize

Site .yahoo.com
Anonymize

Site .pcqanda.com
Anonymize
www.yahoo.com gives me Rules.
www.pcqanda.com does not.
by therube
Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:25 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools
Replies: 8
Views: 2188

Re: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools

Oops, I was confusing 52 & 56. So... FF 52.9 with NoScript 5.1.9 installed, is not showing Rules on my end? Regardless of the value of, browser.tabs.remote.autostart (& restarting). (Is that the correct Pref?) (I started with a new Profile, initially with SM 2.49, then the same with 2.53, then the s...
by barbaz
Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:04 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools
Replies: 8
Views: 2188

Re: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools

therube wrote:
Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:48 am
(Was going to check FF 52, but I don't have my signing hack in there, so forgetaboutit! [said nicely].
What signing hack? I don't use any "hack" to disable requiring addon signing, I just set xpinstall.signatures.required to false and it's done.
by therube
Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:48 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools
Replies: 8
Views: 2188

Re: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools

OK, lets start again... Actual results: CSS rules pane is blank. The pertinent part. And for those who don't know what they're supposed to be looking for or what they're looking at... "My" (hacked version) Immaterial (to this issue). So... SeaMonkey 2.49.5 & Basilisk (FF 52 based, I believe), fail. ...
by therube
Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:39 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools
Replies: 8
Views: 2188

Re: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools

Assuming I've done it correctly "my" 5.1.9rc1 looks to be working correctly. SeaMonkey 2.49.5, 2.53, Basilisk 2018.12.18 (all x64, Windows 7 x64). "My" (hacked version), https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=23319. (IMO, some extension [internal] settings, features really bugger up "l...
by barbaz
Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:08 am
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: (Gecko 52 / UXP, e10s disabled) ABE Anonymize breaks devtools
Replies: 8
Views: 2188

Re: ABE Anonymize breaks devtools

... 5.1.9rc1, and I can still reproduce the issue there. So I tried Firefox 52.9, and could not reproduce this issue there...until I tried disabling e10s. UXP-based apps, e.g. Basilisk , are also affected. So is this a NoScript issue, or a platform issue?
by Rome
Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:51 am
Forum: FlashGot Support
Topic: Firefox quantum
Replies: 28
Views: 114398

Re: Firefox quantum

therube wrote:Not with e10s ;-).

FlashGot menu items do not fully display in WF.
disabling multi-process & the context-menu item
by therube
Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:58 pm
Forum: FlashGot Support
Topic: Firefox quantum
Replies: 28
Views: 114398

Re: Firefox quantum

by Thrawn
Mon Jul 16, 2018 2:22 am
Forum: FlashGot Development
Topic: Huge Number of Console Messages
Replies: 17
Views: 100350

Re: Huge Number of Console Messages

... And CPOWs are, as I understand it, a compatibility layer offered by Mozilla to make it easier for unmodified extensions to keep working under e10s - albeit with a performance hit.
by vertigo
Fri May 04, 2018 8:36 pm
Forum: FlashGot Development
Topic: [BUG][E10s] Clicking to focus Firefox window is selecting te
Replies: 2
Views: 92896

Re: [BUG][E10s] Clicking to focus Firefox window is selectin

... to figure out that FlashGot was the issue. Of the many add-ons I have installed, it's one of only two or three that seems to not work right with e10s. Tags to hopefully help others figure this out easier than I did: multi-process , multi process , multiprocess , single click , singleclick , double ...
by kukla
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:40 pm
Forum: Web Tech
Topic: [resolved/unrelated] Waterfox?
Replies: 13
Views: 89037

Re: Waterfox?

I'm finding that several logins don't work until two or three page reloads-- Do you have e10s disabled in Waterfox? Do you have rules in µMatrix that would block cookies? e10s are enabled: Multiprocess Windows 1/1 (Enabled by user) uMatrix not blocking cookies for the ...
by barbaz
Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:18 pm
Forum: Web Tech
Topic: [resolved/unrelated] Waterfox?
Replies: 13
Views: 89037

Re: Waterfox?

kukla wrote: I'm finding that several logins don't work until two or three page reloads--
Do you have e10s disabled in Waterfox?
Do you have rules in µMatrix that would block cookies?
by Giorgio Maone
Sun Feb 25, 2018 10:34 pm
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: [FIXED] NS Classic ABE infinite loop?
Replies: 9
Views: 2372

Re: NS Classic ABE infinite loop?

... secure.informaction.com due to beta channel deprecation and other problems with dual branches on AMO x Fixed edge case ABE Anon action loop with e10s enabled on reload after new rule (thanks barbaz for reporting)