InformAction Forums

... considered, Ladybird would need to support WebExtensions extensions and all the required WebExtensions APIs. Note that although NoScript runs in Chromium, the more advanced NoScript features (which would include ABE when that comes back) require more advanced WebExtensions APIs that are currently ...

... and it tries to load anything, even an image, from an unrelated directory (e.g. "file:///home/fatboy/.config/chromium/Avatars/avatar_generic.png"), then a "x-load" placeholder is shown, and also in the permissions popup you get a CUSTOM line ...

... and it tries to load anything, even an image, from an unrelated directory (e.g. "file:///home/fatboy/.config/chromium/Avatars/avatar_generic.png"), then a "x-load" placeholder is shown, and also in the permissions popup you get a CUSTOM line ...

... should simply fail to connect. This doesn't help tell whether or not NoScript is receiving its own internal messages. I tested checking using the Chromium devtools (F12) > Network: if this panel is open while NoScript is messaging itself by this method, both the request and NoScript's synthetic ...

... should simply fail to connect. This doesn't help tell whether or not NoScript is receiving its own internal messages. I tested checking using the Chromium devtools (F12) > Network: if this panel is open while NoScript is messaging itself by this method, both the request and NoScript's synthetic ...

... of Chrome. Thanks What NoScript version would you like to downgrade to? You can get 11.4.44 at https://noscript.net/getit/#nonstore-versions-for-chromium , and looks like a few other old versions down to NoScript 12.0.2 are also still available EDIT If you downgrade this way, note that the locally-installed ...

Hi, barbaz. Those messages look to be coming from Chromium, not NoScript, in which case NoScript wouldn't have control over them. But until NS version 12 they did not appear. Can't do anything? I tried to filter them out with a regular expression, ...

... can change the message level of your `[Report Only]` debug in Chrome to info or warning, better than error. Those messages look to be coming from Chromium, not NoScript, in which case NoScript wouldn't have control over them. These messages appear by the hundreds, making it impossible to debug ...

... in Chrome to info or warning, better than error. These messages appear by the hundreds, making it impossible to debug a web development project in Chromium. I'm an absolute fan of Fx, but there's no choice but to test that everything works in the most popular browser. PS: I finally got through ...

... don't load (regardless of why they don't load - not just user blocking, but also a network error would have the same effect). You can check in the Chromium developer tools Console for any errors that look related to those scripts missing. But ultimately the only way to be sure is to try allowing ...

https://www.gocomics.com/dogsofckennel/2015/05/23

Yeah, the Manifest V3 version of NoScript for Chromium was released within the last 2 weeks..

Brave is not an officially supported browser , and the Chromium Manifest V3 version of NoScript is known to still have some rough edges even on officially-supported Chromium-based browsers. Does it help to switch to the Manifest v2 version of NoScript ...

Please check 12.0.6 from https://noscript.net/getit/#nonstore-ve ... r-chromium thanks.

Brave is not an officially supported browser , and the Chromium Manifest V3 version of NoScript is known to still have some rough edges even on officially-supported Chromium-based browsers. Does it help to switch to the Manifest v2 version of NoScript ...

iiic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:41 am yes, 12.0.3 now it's in official chrome extensions store

12.0.5 is in the queue and here if you want to check it (it should fix most if not all the MV3 issues reported so far).