Search found 9 matches

by Sophira
Mon Oct 05, 2015 12:28 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Blocking *all* JS on archived pages on the Wayback Machine?
Replies: 3
Views: 4583

Re: Blocking *all* JS on archived pages on the Wayback Machi

Thanks! I hadn't really realised that sandboxing was an option. It also turns out I wasn't fully understanding how the Wayback Machine did some things. I now have a much more comprehensive collection of rules that does exactly what I want (order is important!): Site ^https?://web\.archive\.org\/web\...
by Sophira
Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:13 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Blocking *all* JS on archived pages on the Wayback Machine?
Replies: 3
Views: 4583

Blocking *all* JS on archived pages on the Wayback Machine?

Hi. :) I have a bit of a problem that I can't seem to solve completely with NoScript and ABE. I use the Internet Archive Wayback Machine quite extensively, as well as the Internet Archive in general. Unfortunately, the Wayback Machine's main interface for selecting the archived pages/dates requires ...
by Sophira
Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:28 pm
Forum: ABE
Topic: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with CDNs
Replies: 6
Views: 6151

Re: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with C

That, and the fact that pressing Cancel doesn't actually cancel your changes. When I pressed Ctrl+Z, my first instinct was not to press Ctrl+Y (which would have restored it) but to click Cancel. Unfortunately the changes still get saved when you do that.
by Sophira
Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:48 am
Forum: ABE
Topic: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with CDNs
Replies: 6
Views: 6151

Re: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with C

Yep, the buggy behaviour still occurs in 2.6.7, as does the other buggy behaviour I mentioned that nearly lost me my ABE rules. How should I go about reporting these?
by Sophira
Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:41 am
Forum: ABE
Topic: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with CDNs
Replies: 6
Views: 6151

Re: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with C

The first example works fine, thanks! After some experimentation, I found that this also works: Site o.aolcdn.com Accept from www.shoutcast.com s.aolcdn.com Deny INCLUSION(SCRIPT) Site s.aolcdn.com Accept from www.shoutcast.com o.aolcdn.com Deny INCLUSION(SCRIPT) I'm confused as to why that works an...
by Sophira
Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:22 pm
Forum: ABE
Topic: Problem with allowing site-specific script access with CDNs
Replies: 6
Views: 6151

Problem with allowing site-specific script access with CDNs

I'm using NoScript's implementation of ABE in order to allow certain CDNs only from their relevant sites. To do this, I have rules such as these: Site o.aolcdn.com Accept from www.shoutcast.com Accept from s.aolcdn.com Deny INCLUSION(SCRIPT) Site s.aolcdn.com Accept from www.shoutcast.com Accept fro...
by Sophira
Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:00 pm
Forum: Metaforum
Topic: Discussion of Board post icons, split as O/T from elsewhere
Replies: 13
Views: 11968

Re: Site-Specific-Permission Questions? PLEASE READ THIS FIR

You know, I never considered that all of the threads I was seeing might be stickies. For some reason I thought the little asterisk on the top-right of the thread icon indicated a sticky post, but it's actually the exclamation point in the icon. I've never seen so many stickies in a forum before! And...
by Sophira
Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:04 pm
Forum: Metaforum
Topic: Discussion of Board post icons, split as O/T from elsewhere
Replies: 13
Views: 11968

Re: Site-Specific-Permission Questions? PLEASE READ THIS FIR

Never mind - it may indeed have been stickied. I didn't realise that topics with unread replies will still show up above sticky topics, and I mistook the red symbol for meaning 'sticky' when it meant 'unread'. So it's quite possible it was sticky before now and I just never noticed. Sorry for the co...
by Sophira
Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:33 am
Forum: Metaforum
Topic: Discussion of Board post icons, split as O/T from elsewhere
Replies: 13
Views: 11968

Discussion of Board post icons, split as O/T from elsewhere

(Split as O/T to sticky post, Site-Specific-Permission Questions? PLEASE READ THIS FIRST! -- Tom t.)


Hmm. It wasn't stickied when I saw it earlier today, actually - it was fourth in the list, not at the top, and didn't have the sticky symbol that it does now. Still, it's sticky now, so yay :D