Search found 7521 matches
- Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:31 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
- Replies: 15
- Views: 512
Re: [BUG] Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
Now, in the NoScript Options page, "Disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" has a corresponding (option to) "Restore restrictions on browser restart" & that would then reset a "Disable restrictions globally" - on a browser restart. But the, "Temporarily set ...
- Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:27 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
- Replies: 15
- Views: 512
Re: [BUG] Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
"Temp TRUSTED" should be canceled when the browser restarts.Isn't it? "Temp. TRUSTED", when you "Temp. TRUSTED" a site using the NoScript dropdown icon is cancelled on a browser restart (as the setting was only, temporary). "Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUS...
- Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:19 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
- Replies: 15
- Views: 512
Re: [BUG] Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
maybe it should be changed to "Automatically set top-level sites to Temp. TRUSTED"? To me, that would make it sound like it is "Temp." trusted, as in since it is "Temp", at some point, like with a browser restart, one would then expect that since it was "Temp"...
- Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:15 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
- Replies: 15
- Views: 512
Re: [BUG] Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED glitch
Isn't NoScript 11.4, Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED going to be exactly the same as NoScript 5.1, Temporarily allow top-level sites by default both of which are blanket trusts (for the "top-level" site), set in a global fashion, & are expected to persist a browser restart. ...
- Mon Aug 19, 2024 4:03 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Google Chrome will soon no longer support NoScipt
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1055
Re: Google Chrome will soon no longer support NoScipt
Sounds like, & assuming it works, & until Chrome nixes it, it should apply to any extension, so NoScript included.Does this concern NS too?
- Mon Aug 19, 2024 3:55 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: No website is loading after a while
- Replies: 10
- Views: 561
Re: No website is loading after a while
(An old thread that related to Windows 7 (not what the OP is using), Firefox stops loading pages until NoScript disabled or Firefox restarted , that might provide some clues as to what to look for; like if https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ happens to still load, or if you may have gotten a &...
- Thu Aug 15, 2024 3:43 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Random specifc URL scripting blocked regardless of permissions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 406
Re: Random specifc URL scripting blocked regardless of permissions
What version of FF?
What version of NoScript?
What version of NoScript?
- Thu Aug 08, 2024 4:54 pm
- Forum: Security
- Topic: 0.0.0.0 Day: Exploiting Localhost APIs From the Browser
- Replies: 0
- Views: 411
0.0.0.0 Day: Exploiting Localhost APIs From the Browser
0.0.0.0 Day: Exploiting Localhost APIs From the Browser the “0.0.0.0 Day” vulnerability. This vulnerability allows malicious websites to bypass browser security and interact with services running on an organization’s local network, potentially leading to unauthorized access and remote code executio...
- Thu Aug 08, 2024 3:33 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: [Fixed] secure.informaction.com down
- Replies: 4
- Views: 515
Re: [Fixed] secure.informaction.com down
(115 ESR, I just updated from .31-rc-something to 11.4.34rc2)
- Thu Aug 08, 2024 3:16 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Resolved] NoScript breaks HTTP/S requests
- Replies: 2
- Views: 335
Re: NoScript breaks HTTP requests
I'll just note that one of the changes in 129 (in case it may have some bearing?) was:
HTTPS is replacing HTTP as the default protocol in the address bar on non-local sites. If a site is not available via HTTPS, Firefox will fall back to HTTP.
- Mon Jul 29, 2024 3:49 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: can't get Indie Wiki Buddy to work with noscript extention
- Replies: 2
- Views: 399
Re: can't get Indie Wiki Buddy to work with noscript extention
What are "Indie Wiki Buddy banners"?
URL?
URL?
- Thu Jul 25, 2024 5:45 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: 11.4.32rc1 breaks meta refresh on script-disabled pages
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1005
11.4.32rc1 breaks meta refresh on script-disabled pages
Might 11.4.32rc1 be breaking things in a Private Window? [or more?] FF 115 ESR google.com is set to Default (in NoScript, so, disabled) gstatic.com is left at its default, Trusted Today, having issues with Google Search not showing search results. Pretty sure ?? that happened in both regular & P...
- Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:15 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Resolved] Enable JavaScript while keeping NoScript active
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1091
Re: Enable JavaScript while keeping NoScript active
You could
NoScript | Options | General -> Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED
which might help some.
Otherwise, sounds like you'd want something that worked on a blacklist basis (where NoScript is based on a whitelist basis).
NoScript | Options | General -> Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED
which might help some.
Otherwise, sounds like you'd want something that worked on a blacklist basis (where NoScript is based on a whitelist basis).
- Wed Jul 17, 2024 6:32 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [hopelessly] (i)frame placeholders
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1239
Re: (i)frame placeholders
Still can't get it to work? In NoScript 2.9.0.12, Embeddings, Forbid <*FRAME>. Right? Any other settings needed in NoScript. And SM 2.38. And yet I'm not getting placeholders? Your screenshot sure seems to indicate that the placeholders are from NoScript. (BTW, SM 2.38 isn't liking much SSL, I guess...
- Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:20 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [hopelessly] (i)frame placeholders
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1239
Re: (i)frame placeholders
(I wasn't looking for an frame at the picture itself, but rather the 2 sides.) SeaMonkey + NS 2.9.0.12 Oh, that's interesting. What version of SeaMonkey? 2.9.0.14 won't even run in current SM. (Installs, but doesn't work. Maybe could be "fixed", but...) In current SeaMonkey 2.53.20 beta 1 ...