Search found 7509 matches
- Thu Jul 25, 2024 5:45 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: 11.4.32rc1 breaks meta refresh on script-disabled pages
- Replies: 2
- Views: 65
11.4.32rc1 breaks meta refresh on script-disabled pages
Might 11.4.32rc1 be breaking things in a Private Window? [or more?] FF 115 ESR google.com is set to Default (in NoScript, so, disabled) gstatic.com is left at its default, Trusted Today, having issues with Google Search not showing search results. Pretty sure ?? that happened in both regular & P...
- Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:15 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: [Resolved] Enable JavaScript while keeping NoScript active
- Replies: 6
- Views: 119
Re: Enable JavaScript while keeping NoScript active
You could
NoScript | Options | General -> Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED
which might help some.
Otherwise, sounds like you'd want something that worked on a blacklist basis (where NoScript is based on a whitelist basis).
NoScript | Options | General -> Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED
which might help some.
Otherwise, sounds like you'd want something that worked on a blacklist basis (where NoScript is based on a whitelist basis).
- Wed Jul 17, 2024 6:32 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: (i)frame placeholders
- Replies: 7
- Views: 192
Re: (i)frame placeholders
Still can't get it to work? In NoScript 2.9.0.12, Embeddings, Forbid <*FRAME>. Right? Any other settings needed in NoScript. And SM 2.38. And yet I'm not getting placeholders? Your screenshot sure seems to indicate that the placeholders are from NoScript. (BTW, SM 2.38 isn't liking much SSL, I guess...
- Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:20 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: (i)frame placeholders
- Replies: 7
- Views: 192
Re: (i)frame placeholders
(I wasn't looking for an frame at the picture itself, but rather the 2 sides.) SeaMonkey + NS 2.9.0.12 Oh, that's interesting. What version of SeaMonkey? 2.9.0.14 won't even run in current SM. (Installs, but doesn't work. Maybe could be "fixed", but...) In current SeaMonkey 2.53.20 beta 1 ...
- Tue Jul 16, 2024 3:00 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: (i)frame placeholders
- Replies: 7
- Views: 192
Re: (i)frame placeholders
(I don't know about such things, but, I'll suspect that the "page" is not a "frame". tom. At least I didn't find "frame" / "iframe" in the code. The left side "navigation menu" is a frame. FF does not see it as a frame [in its' context-menu]. So I'll...
- Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:40 pm
- Forum: NoScript Mobile
- Topic: [Resolved] Not Working In Private Browsing - 127.0a1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 284
Re: [Resolved] Not Working In Private Browsing - 127.0a1
Not Working In Private Browsing Oh yeah, I forgot about that little'ol trick. FF, by default, disables extension in Private Mode. So unless you explicitly enable the extension for Private Windows, you won't see it. If that was the issue, then to me it is not a "me" issue, rather a logic f...
- Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:59 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: Polyfill
- Replies: 2
- Views: 271
Re: Polyfill
it is now a danger Correct. PaleMoon: Polyfill supply chain attack: New Chinese domain owner infects dependent sites And you can take it further (much further, actually) as it is not only "polyfill"... but anything that is "3rd party"... And you can take it further, because of s...
- Mon Jun 03, 2024 5:10 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: PM x64 33.x crash with noscript
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2262
Re: PM x64 33.x crash with noscript
Since I didn't know (or had forgotten):
PaleMoon: Go to preferences...security... Set "No add-ons will be blocked" Voila!--NoScript will run.
PaleMoon: Go to preferences...security... Set "No add-ons will be blocked" Voila!--NoScript will run.
- Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:03 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: PM x64 33.x crash with noscript
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2262
Re: PM x64 33.x crash with noscript
NoScript is not supported on PM, they won't even talk to you if you have it installed. That is known. AFAIK, it works (though with the latest versions of PM, it is apt to crash PM [video related, seemingly]...). (Not really concerned about it one way or the other, but IMO NoScript is just something ...
- Mon Jun 03, 2024 3:59 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Issue with You Tube with NoScript
- Replies: 1
- Views: 554
Re: Issue with You Tube with NoScript
(I've read that) YT is dabbling with blocking blockers. So... as far as I'm concerned, screw them. Anyhow, FF 115.x, & NoScript & uBlock, & I do a search, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=youtube+blocker, & at least the first few clips played as expected. I allowed youtub...
- Fri May 31, 2024 3:10 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: PM x64 33.x crash with noscript
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2262
Re: PM x64 33.x crash with noscript
Just so you know, if you change the NoScript's "GUID" (in install.rdf, in noscript...xpi), NoScript will install in current PaleMoon. "Install" does not change any potential negative consequences (like PM crashing), but at least it can be used, till then ;-). Something like this ...
- Tue May 28, 2024 3:50 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Settings: noscript checkbox
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1809
Re: Settings: noscript checkbox
"any site" Good question. Looks like it's going to be this, https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?p=106306#p106306. Knowing that, I'm going to use it, actually. Like at dslreports.com, I'll keep dslreports.com itself at Default, but Always allow dsl.net, but only on dslreports.com...
- Tue May 28, 2024 3:39 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Feature Request: Plays nice with Containers!
- Replies: 9
- Views: 27476
Re: Feature Request: Plays nice with Containers!
Depending on what google service you're using, you might be able to do something like, Allow mail.google.com (for gmail), but leave google.com itself set at default, so not allowed - in my case . (I also Allow gstatic.com, which I suppose is needed ? but don't really know.) So gmail always works, &a...
- Mon Apr 29, 2024 3:34 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Security and Privacy Information "feature" driving me nuts
- Replies: 3
- Views: 815
Re: Security and Privacy Information "feature" driving me nuts
It looks like if you were to click the Cancel button in the dialog, then you are returned to where you were.
If you simply close the Tab, then you're left at the end (of your tabs).
(FF has many instances, that act in a malicious way, totally whacking focus from where it was.)
If you simply close the Tab, then you're left at the end (of your tabs).
(FF has many instances, that act in a malicious way, totally whacking focus from where it was.)
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 3:15 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: Safeway.com
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1871
Safeway.com
So I go to safeway.com - in a Private window, with NoScript enabled (of course). And I get: Pardon Our Interruption As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen: You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser. You're a powe...