
Search found 8 matches
- Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:29 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: [RESOLVED] 2.6.9.7 silently disables scripts on Pale Moon
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3104
Re: [RESOLVED] 2.6.9.7 silently disables scripts on Pale Moo
Thanks for the quick response, Giorgio. RC2 seems fine now that I've had a chance to try it. 

- Tue Dec 16, 2014 7:23 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: [RESOLVED] 2.6.9.7 silently disables scripts on Pale Moon
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3104
[RESOLVED] 2.6.9.7 silently disables scripts on Pale Moon
Running PM 25.1.0, I noticed earlier today that Stack Overflow was reporting a problem with site scripts being blocked. That was annoying, but I assumed it was transient at first. Then I tried a search with Bing, and when the scripts there failed to function also, I realized something was seriously ...
- Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:55 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5578
Re: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/batteryconfig.aspx?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd is another example of a page that has this problem -- http://dell.com is the source for at least one of the scripts, but can only be listed as dell.com (no http:// prefix available). Can You resolved this issue? ...
- Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:15 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5578
Re: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
Anyway: until some other site shows up that has this problem of root temp whitelisting, I guess I'll just have to leave it at that.... Thanks. Good ol' MySpace... I shoulda thought of them sooner :roll: . Naturally, MySpace hosts scripts on its root domain. So I can easily repro on this domain. Her...
- Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:39 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5578
Re: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
Yes, actually, I do, on both profiles that I tested on. And as mentioned, I can't repro the problem any more right now, so I can't tell if ABP is responsible. I should also mention that there is no obvious functionality loss on this particular site -- it's merely that this site is (was) a good testc...
- Sat Nov 14, 2009 8:21 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5578
Re: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
I'm unable to reproduce the behavior you describe with the options and two permanent whitelistings specified. Hmm, that's not good. Maybe I'll have to skim through the other settings to see if there are any others that jump out at me. Do I have to sign in to see what you see? I don't have an accoun...
- Sat Nov 14, 2009 8:20 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: [BUG] Temporarily allow top-level sites and untrusted
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2924
Re: [BUG] Temporarily allow top-level sites and untrusted
I've seen this behavior too, but like therube I'm not sure if it's intended or not. I don't particularly like it, but it does seem like a potentially useful default.
- Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:32 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5578
BUG? Can't allow just e.g. http://microsoft.com
I'm posting this in Development because I'm fairly sure it's a bug, and because I don't really need support with it ;). (Hopefully I didn't miss a similar post in my search, but I looked as hard as I could.) Using NS 1.9.9.14 (stable and devel are apparently identical); same behavior since I last ch...