Search found 41 matches
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:43 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
****, one of my postings got lost somehow. As I say, restarting the browser worked to clear NoScript's cache, and stop it seeing more than one address for "jessie". During that temporary test. The comment about IPv6 LLAs not being counted as LOCAL was from here: https://github.com/avian2/n...
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:36 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
Per my postings, it started working after I restarted the browser. I think this makes sense, NoScript could still have the IPv6 LLA in its own cache. Together with the IPv4 "private" address, it means a mix of LOCAL and non-LOCAL addresses, which causes the default denial. Is there somethi...
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:51 am
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
So - looking at barbaz' suggestion, and the default rules, I can add this at the top of SYSTEM: # nodots often include IPv6 link-local # which NoScript is apparently forced to treat as non-LOCAL # to avoid breaking mis-configured websites. # Examples: LLMNR and nss-mymachines # # There are not suppo...
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:57 am
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
What are my LOCAL addresses, if they don't include both the IPv4 network directly connected to virbr0, and IPv6 link-local addresses? According to the PDF, LOCAL special token for local network (private IPv4 and IPv6, see RFC 3330 and RFC 4193) Note RFC 4193 is only about Unique Local Addresses, it...
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:48 am
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
Huh. It doesn't seem like it's IPv6-specific either... If I remove the ipv6 address from the container, it disappears from `getent hosts`. Again, I can connect to jessie and use `netstat -t` to check that the connection is using the ipv4 addresses and not ipv6. But I still get the ABE error. I'm not...
- Sat Jun 10, 2017 7:39 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
What are my LOCAL addresses, if they don't include both the IPv4 network directly connected to virbr0, and IPv6 link-local addresses?
- Sat Jun 10, 2017 4:12 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
Re: ABE vs libvirt
Sorry, I'm used to being able to edit...
The bridge is libvirt, but the server is a systemd-nspawn container. That's how the name "jessie" is resolved - the host has nss-mymachines installed.
The bridge is libvirt, but the server is a systemd-nspawn container. That's how the name "jessie" is resolved - the host has nss-mymachines installed.
- Sat Jun 10, 2017 4:09 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: ABE vs libvirt
- Replies: 10
- Views: 114800
ABE vs libvirt
[ABE] < LOCAL> Deny on {GET http://jessie/icons/openlogo-75.png <<< http://jessie/ - 1} SYSTEM rule: Site LOCAL Accept from LOCAL Deny $ getent ahosts jessie 192.168.122.74 STREAM jessie 192.168.122.74 DGRAM 192.168.122.74 RAW fe80::b4f5:2ff:feb9:b12f STREAM fe80::b4f5:2ff:feb9:b12f DGRAM fe80::b4f...
- Fri Dec 30, 2016 6:35 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: RFE: default whitelist about:accounts for Firefox Sync
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2899
Re: RFE: default whitelist about:accounts for Firefox Sync
about:accounts is still not whitelisted .
- Sat May 24, 2014 12:37 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: RFE: default whitelist about:accounts for Firefox Sync
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2899
RFE: default whitelist about:accounts for Firefox Sync
I just installed a fresh Firefox set up with NoScript, and the new version of Firefox Sync. Clicking "sign in" in the sync preferences pane opened a new tab which simply showed "Firefox Accounts requires javascript". Unfortunately I had to manually whitelist the following: about:...
- Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:17 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: "Allow scripts globally" warning message shows "\n" escapes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1798
Re: "Allow scripts globally" warning message shows "\n" esca
I typed a message, entered my user "sourcejedi" as the user, and was told I couldn't use that username. I wasn't logged in at the time. So I had to choose a different username to submit the post with :). I wasn't going to faff around with anything like trying to log in using the link. The ...
- Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:59 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghostery)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5713
Re: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghost
Yep, that's exactly what I quoted. [Though I didn't want to use that sort of tone. I can see why it might be useful to "set the record straight" for more casual readers, so to speak. But if we're talking about carelessness, or blaming unrelated issues - what the other thread mentioned was ...
- Fri Jul 20, 2012 6:14 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghostery)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5713
Re: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghost
Thanks!
"It happens also with NoScript uninstalled and JavaScript disabled from Firefox's own content panel."
- confirmed.
"It happens also with NoScript uninstalled and JavaScript disabled from Firefox's own content panel."
- confirmed.
- Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:55 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghostery)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5713
Re: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghost
Thanks for pointing the Error Console out. Unfortunately it doesn't show anything relevant - just errors for two fonts blocked by NoScript. I don't think "Recently blocked sites" is telling me anything either. "Something happening to page anchors" - that's not what I was thinking...
- Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:22 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghostery)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5713
Re: Fragment navigation broken (cross-page, Noscript & Ghost
But it's not a stylesheet issue, is it? And I know NoScript affects fragment URLs (for #! => ?_escaped_fragment_= support), so there's certainly room for a bug there. == continuing the offtopic thread == The essential UI for Ghostery, at least, is pretty well polished. Numeric indicator, "What ...