Thank youGiorgio Maone wrote:FRAME works for both IFRAMEs an FRAMEs (they're equivalent security-wise, so there's little or no point to differentiate them further).royallin wrote: FRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com work
IFRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com don't work
Search found 20 matches
- Tue Oct 23, 2012 2:03 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
- Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:00 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Please check latest development build 2.5.9rc2, FRAME@https?://my.site.com should work now :) Thank you.The 2.5.9rc2 was tested.But something confused me. Forbid<IFRAME> was checked. Forbid<FRAME> didn't checded. but FRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com work IFRAME@https?://www\.baidupcs\.com don't wo...
- Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:09 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
The rules don't work,why? Because IFRAME is a HTML tag, not a MIME content type identifier. Supposing the frame is loading an html document, you need something like text/html@https?://www\.example\.com The website: http://pan.baidu.com/share/link?shareid ... 2684733227 GIF record http://imgur.com/K...
- Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:45 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
application/x-iframe@https?://www\.example\.com or application/x-<iframe>@https?://www\.example\.com or application/iframe@https?://www\.example\.com or application/<iframe>@https?://www\.example\.com or application/IFRAME@https?://www\.example\.com or application/<IFRAME>@https?://www\.example\.com...
- Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:41 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Re GµårÐïåñ: Thanks for the translation,it's pretty good. :D Because of the video by therube,so i think he or she is a chinese,so i want to share the forum with. :D HE is not Chinese and as the handle suggests "therube" he is full blooded American from somewhere in the good old east of th...
- Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:44 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
MOD_EDIT: Not sure why we need the statement of thanks finished with the Chinese but here is my rusty translation: 1 How may I ask finding x-shockwave-flash? the noscript tips also only shockwave-flash. 2 Do you usually interact with Firefox Chinese forum? Welcome to www.firefox.net.cn, and g.mozes...
- Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:41 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Try: application/x-shockwave-flash@https?://115\.com That looks to be working. (click to play) http://v6.tinypic.com/player.swf?file=2zi7hc0 Awesome, :D IT's worked! Thank you! 1 请问是怎么找到 x-shockwave-flash的?noscript里的提示也只有shockwave-flash。 2 请问你通常混那些火狐中文论坛?欢迎到www.firefox.net.cn和g.mozest.com交流。 MOD_ED...
- Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:01 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Thank you!Thrawn wrote:You might need to wait for NoScript 3.x for the desktop or use ABE...there's a post at the top of the support board about site-specific permissions.
- Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:30 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
If you're confident editing about:config, then you can try editing noscript.allowedMimeRegExp. See http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=6701 for more details. Thank you! I tryed application/shockwave-flash@https?://.*115\.com Even application/.*@.* It's still the same. :| The nos...
- Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:35 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Yes, you are right.But the problem is i need it in the whitelisted sites too.Thrawn wrote:It sounds like you need to switch off Options-Embeddings-"Apply these restrictions to whitelisted sites too". You can still block Flash for untrusted sites, but allow it for trusted ones.
- Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:09 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Probably the page relies on a Flash object running when the page loads. You might be able to find the specific Flash object via the NoScript menu, instead of allowing all, but I think that reloading the page will be unavoidable. For now, you can make it work by allowing all and reloading, yes? Mayb...
- Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:15 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
Re: A bug of flashblock function
Hi, royallin. I couldn't get all of the details from your GIF video, sorry, because I don't speak your language (Chinese?). However, it looks like what happened is: The upload required a Flash object. NoScript blocked this and gave you a placeholder. You clicked the placeholder, chose a file, but n...
- Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:14 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A bug of flashblock function
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13182
A bug of flashblock function
Tested in Firefox3.6.24~Firefox16.0(nightly) Noscript2.4.1rc1~2.4.7rc3 When noscript's "flash blcok"function was checked. Upload filed was broken in www.115.com or some other website,like on line music and edg. A gif video: Full screen in http://imgur.com/TT68q http://i.imgur.com/TT68q.gif...
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:55 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Noscript2.2.9RC1 was broken in Firefox13.0a1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2581
Re: Noscript2.2.9RC1 was broken in Firefox13.0a1
Thanks!Giorgio Maone wrote:It might be this.
PS: How about add a function to contorl inline javascript?
Like:
<script type="text/javascript">
xxxxxxx
x
xxxxx
</script>
Into the edit mode,replace or delete the scripts by click on some script that want to remove.
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:40 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Noscript2.2.9RC1 was broken in Firefox13.0a1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2581
Noscript2.2.9RC1 was broken in Firefox13.0a1
HI, Noscript2.2.9RC1 was broken in Firefox13.0a1.Wroking well in FF12.0A1 or↓version。 Problem: Flash video have sound but not video. Like: http://v.youku.com/v_playlist/f6452418o1p0.html Have sound but not video.Website show "have not install flashplayer".But have sound,video auto play.