InformAction Forums

@barbaz can your descriptions be added to the actual ui of the add-on? It is dumb the extension doesn't explain itself within its actual gui. Even with the descriptions from your post here https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=26285 it would be nice to see description: script - Jav...

Thank you for the replies. It is good to know that it catches those things

I understand the idea of NoScript is to be a script blocker first... and then other items (object, frame, font, webgl, fetch, etc.) can be blocked once a domain has been identified by using javascript. However it would be nice to have other items trigger a domain to be blockable if they appear w/o t...

While we're at it, it would be nice to be able to block other 3rd party things even if a script what not referenced. I prefer uBlock Origin nowadays because I can block other items even when the domain does not have scripts. And prevent a bit more as well. I don't know if XHR's and websockets fall ...

While we're at it, it would be nice to be able to block other 3rd party things even if a script what not referenced. I prefer uBlock Origin nowadays because I can block other items even when the domain does not have scripts. And prevent a bit more as well. I don't know if XHR's and websockets fall u...

I still don't understand this pref. So you are saying checked would mean it is a stricter policy? "Cascade top document's restrictions to subdocuments" To me this sounds like a looser policy. I would rather a subdocuments' permissions be granted or restricted separately. If I allow script/...

storage-sync.sqlite is created within your profile folder when extensions are installed. You can use a sqlite database browser to view its contents but there are other extensions that might have data in there as well (HTTPS everywhere, cleanlinks, uBlock Origin, etc.) For a standard enterprise image...

Thanks. I was wondering if that was the case. Perhaps that will be possible at a later time. Sometimes I am hesitant if allowing scripts might open the floodgates for something I may not desire- though I assume I only allow scripts on things I mostly trust anyways.

I don't know if "script", "other", or "object" control these web technologies but it would be nice to have the ability to block sites from creating service workers, web notifications, device sensor access, web beacons, running web assembly code, indexdb, dom storage, cl...

Hello, I was wondering if/how NoScript addresses webassembly and asm.js? From what I understand, both are powerful and complement javascript. I also gather they are both currently popular for cryptomining. If NoScript ever supports blocking webassembly and/or asm.js would it be treated as script or ...

To add to this, is there really a purpose to marking a domain as Untrusted versus letting the default rule prevent?

Giorgio, would you consider to unsticky some of the old threads?

I tried the new web extension earlier this week. The only thing I didn't like was how you couldn't whitelist just one domain. You just have to keep clicking whitelist > refresh until everything is trusted when it may just need only trusting some code on one domain. But man it is so much faster than ...

Any input on this issue?

Install Firefox for Android

Install noscript

Export settings... Saves your settings to your downloads folder

Import settings... Button doesn't do anything

The button to import saved settings does not do anything. You can export but not import.

For what it's worth, uBlock and Privacy Badger may have examples to get it to work.