Search found 23 matches
- Mon Nov 06, 2023 8:27 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 48726
Re: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
Thank you. It seems I made a fault with my last test. I could restore the site-settings with copying storange-sync-v2.* But it's a pity that it is still necessary to copy the storage\*.* files to restore the checkbox "restore settings after browser-restart" and dark/light design + high-con...
- Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:22 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: NS hiding some domains
- Replies: 7
- Views: 26531
Re: NS hiding some domains
I occasionally see this behaviour, too. NS lists one ore more blocked sites but one or more not. Also when the restrictions for the tab are disabled, possibly there are sites missing in the list. Is it the same issue like the differing number on the badge? For example this forum: at the moment the b...
- Thu Nov 02, 2023 9:19 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 48726
Re: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
Do you have about:config > webextensions.storage.sync.enabled set to false? Thank you I didn't look for an answer a few months, but the problem still exists. Yes, webextensions.storage.sync.enabled was set to false, just because I don't want to use Firefox Sync and thought, the setting could establ...
- Thu Jan 26, 2023 11:23 pm
- Forum: Ragnarök
- Topic: split from t=26439
- Replies: 2
- Views: 25034
- Fri Jan 06, 2023 11:08 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 48726
Re: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
Long time ago since I asked this... It's curious, now I use FF 102 ESR and still there's no storage-sync-v2.sqlite on my computer (am I the only one??) and I'm still looking for a possibility to deploy individual NS-settings (without "Cloud").
- Tue Mar 29, 2022 8:59 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Any way to revert graphical change?
- Replies: 111
- Views: 38220
Re: Any way to revert graphical change?
Noscript was a real good and lean program for years. It did its job and was always slightly improved. But now it seems the developer has too much leisure time. There was absolutely no need to change the UI. It only could react faster (after the re-issue as webextension), that would be a reason to ch...
- Sat Jan 29, 2022 10:07 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Is there a whitelist/blacklist available which I can download and use with Noscript
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3275
Re: Is there a whitelist/blacklist available which I can download and use with Noscript
Hi,
I'd like to ask again, maybe Giorgio Maone, could you answer please?
Could you provide a (few) line(s) of code to run in the browser console to import a NoScript settings-file? Thanks in advance.
I'd like to ask again, maybe Giorgio Maone, could you answer please?
Could you provide a (few) line(s) of code to run in the browser console to import a NoScript settings-file? Thanks in advance.
- Sat Jan 01, 2022 6:45 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Is there a whitelist/blacklist available which I can download and use with Noscript
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3275
Re: Is there a whitelist/blacklist available which I can download and use with Noscript
@security_matters For using external lists it should be possible: - export all settings - edit settings-file (merging per-site-settings) - import all settings These steps could be done automatically. I'm interested in this, too. That does a full import of *all* NoScript settings from a file, overwri...
- Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:25 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: [Resolved] Global Privacy Control
- Replies: 3
- Views: 22312
- Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:28 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: UserScripts / userChromeJS
- Replies: 0
- Views: 17199
UserScripts / userChromeJS
Many of you know UserScripts (GreaseMonkey and forks). Less known is, that much of the function can be achieved without an extension, but only 2 little script files in the Firefox program folder. The modification is called "userChromeJS": https://github.com/Endor8/userChrome.js/tree/master...
- Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:13 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: JavaScript Restrictor, JShelter, JS-Shield,...?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15864
Re: JavaScript Restrictor, JShelter, JS-Shield,...?
Don't they all link to the same extension "Javascript Restrictor"? Sounds interesting, when I have the time...
- Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:08 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: A toggle for svg
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4595
Re: A toggle for svg
As written in the other thread, I found a solution:
user_pref("extensions.torbutton.noscript_persist", true);
I'll send you the script for SVG
user_pref("extensions.torbutton.noscript_persist", true);
I'll send you the script for SVG
- Mon Nov 29, 2021 9:03 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Tor Browser - Toggling svg.disabled deletes all Per-site Permissions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2190
Re: Tor Browser - Toggling svg.disabled deletes all Per-site Permissions
It's already an issue: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/appli ... sues/40666
Because of bugs I still use TB 10. There this setting helps:
user_pref("extensions.torbutton.noscript_persist", true);
Because of bugs I still use TB 10. There this setting helps:
user_pref("extensions.torbutton.noscript_persist", true);
- Wed Nov 10, 2021 8:17 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 48726
Re: deploy individual settings (FF 91 ESR)
Maybe my last post - had to solve ~50 captchas :-( These captchas really are a pain. Steal time and support Google. You can decide to register, then there are no captchas. This was the reason for me... Back to the original question, does anybody have an idea, why in some installations of Firefox 91...
- Wed Nov 10, 2021 7:58 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Per-site permissions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1628
Re: Per-site permissions
Oh, there is hope... good to know. In the last days I already thought about switching to uBlock because there seems to be silence around NoScript development. But I'd prefer to stay with NoScript as the only extension.