Thank you
I raised an issue: (1478037) Allow bookmarklets to run even when the CSP on the page would normally block javascript: execution · Issue #1512 · MrAlex94/Waterfox
Search found 11 matches
- Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:54 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: Bookmarklets, non-trusted sites, Firefox ESR 68 and Waterfox Current
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20296
- Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:40 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: NoScript as an attack surface: review of a 2013 quote
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22395
Re: NoScript as an attack surface: review of a 2013 quote
Thanks
With apologies for a late response (I must have overlooked an e-mail notification):
With apologies for a late response (I must have overlooked an e-mail notification):
I struck through that part of my answer in Stack Exchange.
- Sun Mar 29, 2020 1:26 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: Bookmarklets, non-trusted sites, Firefox ESR 68 and Waterfox Current
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20296
Bookmarklets, non-trusted sites, Firefox ESR 68 and Waterfox Current
For example, the first bookmarklet at JavaScript Tricks: Edit Websites in Browser (Live) The behaviour of Waterfox Current 2020.03 is – as expected – consistent with the behaviour of Firefox ESR 68.6.0esr (64-bit): for an untrusted site, the bookmarklet does not work. With NoScript 11.0.23 added to ...
- Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:29 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: NoScript as an attack surface: review of a 2013 quote
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22395
Re: NoScript as an attack surface: review of a 2013 quote
Thanks, was my response reasonable?
- Sun Jan 05, 2020 4:25 pm
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: NoScript as an attack surface: review of a 2013 quote
- Replies: 4
- Views: 22395
NoScript as an attack surface: review of a 2013 quote
A January 2013 answer in Information Security Stack Exchange , part of which was quoted in a November 2019 question : Take into consideration that NoScript will also increase the attack surface My response: https://security.stackexchange.com/a/223723/13575 – the second part of the answer (below the ...
- Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:47 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Non-registrations and losses of service workers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8555
Losses of service workers
Excellent. Thanks for the explanation!storage.googleapis.com
Now I need to discover what causes losses – https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/-/51431 ... ahamperrin
- Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:44 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Non-registrations and losses of service workers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8555
Clarification
With a different profile, testing NoScript alone, I find prevention of registration but not loss of registered service workers. Screen recording: https://s.put.re/Nyu3Ek5J.mp4 If there's a way for NoScript to allow registration , this will be a step towards helping me to identify what may be partly ...
- Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:32 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Non-registrations and losses of service workers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8555
Non-registrations and losses of service workers
NoScript 11.0.11 with Firefox 72.0: service workers are lost, I see no way to prevent the loss.
Please, is this a known issue?
Background (before I identified NoScript as a cause): Absence of service workers in Firefox 72 : firefox
Please, is this a known issue?
Background (before I identified NoScript as a cause): Absence of service workers in Firefox 72 : firefox
- Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:20 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: googletagmanager.com
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1635
googletagmanager.com
Road Trip – https://roadtrip.glitch.me/ When googletagmanager.com is blocked, there's no hint of the block in the main icon: https://s.put.re/yWd54iaJ.com.png Is this expected? NoScript 11.0.11 with Firefox 72.0: no hint. NoScript 5.1.9 with home-built Waterfox Classic 2019.12 (20200103060435): work...
- Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:51 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: [Invalid] NS Classic causes ServiceWorker-related WebExtension content script to crash the tab
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2582
- Sun Jan 27, 2019 5:45 pm
- Forum: Web Tech
- Topic: TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are slated for the chopping block
- Replies: 7
- Views: 83906