InformAction Forums

Thanks a lot, it is clear that I have underestimated the way FF protects / is protected against such an approach. My idea use-case is harmless enough, but no doubt such a thing could be misused.
Anyway your answer does - as always - help a lot to set expectations right.
Best Regards

If you try installing NoScript latest development build in your (working) FF/µMatrix profile, leaving NoScript in completely default configuration except for setting sites to Temp. TRUSTED as needed, do these issues occur for you there? First I haven't tried to RESET Noscript in the FF/NoSc, I just...

I would like to ask somebody to develop a FF extension, where the values of a small number of about:config settings in FF can always be seen (and ideally immediately switched / changed) in a simple, always open small window, user configurable if possible. This is all about better privacy, and I thin...

Okay, I think I found a better example. Please goto https://nextcloud05.webo.cloud/login and see if you get a login prompt with FF/NoSc. There is only one scripting source shown in the NoSc pop-up menu, and even when I turn off NoSc for that tab, the site doesn't show the login prompt, only complain...

I don't wonna appear the wise guy, I am a long-term (but amateur) user of NoSc ... no more. But what you say seems to confirm my findings. NoSc does block something it is not supposed to block and (and this is more important !) it does not or cannot show that it is blocking it. So the user is unawar...

Okay, here is a better example I think as it shows the problem, and it doesn't come with a thousand different scripts, and more from different sources. url : www.moho.info (a booking site for hotels) = how to see the problem ? use FF with NoSc, make sure the options script and fetch are enabled = wh...

1) Could you please post an example affected URL & what are your NoScript permissions on that page? I am trying and haven't found a good example yet - one You are right, I owe you all a good example. It will come, just can't do the tests right now. 2) In the OP, you wrote I have tested NoSc aga...

Thank for your patience with this problem and my inadequate description. Unfortunately your last response only takes us back to the original problem. Since "fetch" is enabled in my "trusted" settings, and the sites described do show problems (of course) after being marked as trus...

Any chance you would try again ? My problem is not that I do not understand which checkbox enables or disables which kind of code/object. My problem is not that I have not tried pretty much any switch on broken sites. My problem is that I cannot make some sites work with NoSc AT ALL, with any switch...

Hello, I could really use some help even after having studied all documentation (but not - admitted - every thread of the forum). I have been using NoSc permanently for many years. NoSc always up-to-date and of course FF up-to date. Over the last years the numbers of sites which do not work or break...

In order to get a captcha prompt from google (recently also required here on the forum) a Noscript user has to enable "frame" and "fetch" in the Noscript settings. To be honest, not only that I am averse to allowing any Google code on my device. But these settings cause other pro...

Sorry if this is posted in the wrong place. I can't find a section for "feature requests". In the past, my be before v10, when you selected "disable globally", there was a warning, sth like "do you really want this ?" Lately if noticed that family members have hit the S...

Dear All, after a few days of using (FF w/ NS) my NS 'per-site permissions' list got filled with 'trusted' entries. Since I do rarely select 'trusted' at all, but do almost always select 'temp.trusted', I have a hard time understanding how the list gets filled so quickly. Even worse, since there is ...