InformAction Forums

I have updated to FF 57.0.2 a few hours ago. Until now I have noticed now new issues with NoScript (in the meantime using version 10.1.5.6). As far as I can see, all works as before.

First of all I would like to make clear that I am very grateful to Giorgio for all his outstanding work.

Nevertheless concerning NoScript 10 during the last time I got the impression that a lot of problems and confusion among the users could have been caused by a combinaton of two different things ...

I wonder if all German libraries are like that? :mrgreen:
Only in combination with Italian software. :mrgreen:
But with version 10.1.5.6. of NoScript freezing has stopped. The (complete) loading of the site has still a delay (compared with deactivated NoScript) but as a whole the site is usable ...

Thanks to you, Bo and tigerjack.

I can confirm both your observations: With version 10.1.5.6rc2 the bibliothek website does not freeze and becomes usable again but it reacts very slow (e.g. when clicking in a link within the website) causing a UPC usage of up to 100%.

Thanks for your encouragement, Bo. ;)

Perhaps you should find a version that feels pretty stable for you and don't move until the next one you feel the same way.
Yes, that's a good idea.


With Sandboxie, you can test all NoScripts versions in the sandbox without affecting your real system.
Of ...

Hello Bo and barbaz,

thanks a lot for your replies and for your tests.

Good to see that I am not alone with my problem. ;)

My trust in NoScript 10 decreases as problems seem to become more.

PS:

10.1.5.2 and it felt better than with 10.1.5.5.
I can confirm that the freeze does not occur with ...

I already wrote about a problem with a certain website when NoScript 10 is activated: https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=24040

Now I discovered (even heavier) issues with another website too:
http://bibliothek.edition-romiosini.de/

In order to be able to use this website I must ...

Thanks, Bo, for this advice. I will think about it.

Hello Bo,

I am glad good to see that you are active here in this forum too. ;)

Usually all changes should be gone when closing my browser, as I use it almost exclusively in ... Sandboxie. ;) But yes, may be that in one of the rare cases when I were outside of the sandbox (e.g. for updating ...

By the way:

Above I wrote:

No one would expect that checking/unchecking a box (in this list) for a certain domain has an effect to all domains! (With exception of course the checkmark list for the Custom scope.)
Why is such a list in every line (= for every domain/subdomain)? When I check or ...

Sorry that I did not read all the thread, but I was already worried when I read the following:


Here are default settings of NoScript 10.1.5.1, for reference:

Default: only "frame", "fetch", and "other" are enabled. Everything else disabled.
In my case it is different (and I am not aware that I ...

No. :( By allowing google.analytics first happened the same as when clicking on the blue bar on top: The contents/text of the pad disappeared. (After refreshing the page the contents were here again.)

Later (e.g. when creating a new pad) the situation is the same as described above: click on the ...

I have allowed publishwith.me and explicitely blocked no site (google.analytics is on default):

"publishwith.me" is a site where you can create online a document (called "pad") in order to collaborate on this document together with others:
https://publishwith.me/

That's the starting page:

https://i.imgur.com/kz06v83.jpg



When clicking on "Create new pad" a page like this will appear ...

It makes no sense other than default, untrusted and untrusted to be scopes, and custom to be not.
But "Custom" is a scope too. See e.g. the following sentences in blunelvita's guide:

There are four scopes: Default, Trusted, Untrusted and Custom.
[...]
Only the Custom scope allows [...]


The ...