InformAction Forums

Very nice stuff, thanks for the studied advice! My only unfortunate thing is that I took one look at those pages and didn't have a clue what was going on. :weary: What I *would* be willing to do would be what my old methodology was and that was to just literally paste the entire minified jQuery code...

There is a functionality which would enable users to perhaps reduce the size of longer posts containing code and suchlike under the 'spoiler' tag. For example, the following BBCODE ... [spoiler=What happens to the hero?]The hero dies at the end![/spoiler] ... would produce a spoiler button showing o...

I have written a teeny-tiny thing so that I can easily get to a StartPage search for a given domain that I've queried in NS. Hope that this is OK, will take it down if Giorgio / Barbaz object ! :) However, with your permission, Giorgio / Barbaz I will make it public. Either way, it is located under ...

Have you thought about offering the code up to these folks to use as a part of the main browser?
( with ABE, of course )

https://ladybird.org/

Nice! I had also noticed this occurring on other domains, too. So, I've seen it occur for SharePoint. What's more, it might potentially break the Multi-Account Containers section too, because both the YT and SP incidents occurred in separate Multi-Account Containers. So it might be worthwhile raisin...

Looks like it was a "me" issue.

Updated, now working in private browsing on nightly.

---

130.0a1 (Build #2016031823), hg-f6ae1b587092+
GV: 130.0a1-20240710212209
AS: 130.20240709050338

I will check for an app update after this but using private browsing for the first time since yesterday's extension update and the extension doesn't show in the extensions flyout menu. I have screenshots, but I'm not sure what value they have showing nothing. 8-) --- Fully OK being told this is a &q...

Ello, long time no speaky, just wondering if anyone might be able to help me set up contextual rules for this as I'm assuming that's the issue. I am using NoScript fully contextually, so there are no sites where they are just blanked allowed. ( apologies for the edited post ... was fighting the filt...

Thanks for the response. :) To re-assert, this doesn't happen for every site, just some. Also, is your experience in Private Browsing? So to confirm the series of events: Open private browsing. Open site with Default permissions. Let's pretend Reddit is one such site for the sake of argument. Tap me...

I'm not sure what the correct way to phrase this is, and I was going to mention it here , but it seems *just* out of scope, and ... eh. OK, so let's say I'm in a (usually private) tab on droid Nightly, and I bring up the NoScript menu to whitelist me some juicy domains. HURRAH! Only I think that a l...

Oh, no, I do get that I'm probably off in parts, but you're right that it's somewhat fit for purpose, too. I mean there *should* be a slash there, in any normal url. But this is trying to ensure that *anything* that has 'recaptcha' after google.com is not accepted. I can certainly edit that in. I'll...

For that first gallery media-lab.ai showed up, btw. imgur allowed beforehand, no refresh needed. --- But, yeah, on your aside ... crikey, a gig of ram ... that can eff off. I'll just note; if imgur.com is not allowed initially, then both (needed) sites do show up. If imgur.com is allowed (beforehand...

FWIW - I've seen this on multiple sites, and added them manually ... I feel like I've mentioned it here before as well, so I'll see if I left a dead thread somewhere. However, none of them occur to me right now, but I've definitely seen it happen. Curiously, if I load up imgur.com (just tested in a ...

(thanks for the url removal, barbaz! - although apparently now I can't edit the post without spammy :lol: ) So here's an updated set: If you trust google not to be hacked: ^.google\.com((?!recaptcha).)*$ For security, then this works: ^\Qhttps://\E(?:[^\/:]+\.)?google\.com((?!recaptcha).)*$ ... or ...

Ooh, nice, thanks. :mrgreen: Would I be right in assuming that the inclusion of the https at the beginning is to ensure secure connection there and that's all? I mean, I know that my one allows any protocol at all, and any subdomain ... in my dumb head I'd thought that prudent here ... but it IS a d...