InformAction Forums

Something else. With 2.9.5.3, an attempt to do this: Site ALL Deny INC(NEWTYPE) will be rejected because NEWTYPE isn't recognized. However, it looks like 5.0.8.1 will accept that rule. Wondering out loud: What would happen if TYPE_NEWTYPE was added to nsIContentPolicy types? How would the existing c...

Thank you, I'll check those out. I found two of the ones I enjoyed:

Robokill: http://www.rocksolidarcade.com/
Minions: http://old.casualcollective.com/#games/Minions (some single player versions elsewhere)

NoScript 5.0.8.1 has been released. ABE now supports more INCLUSION types! I created a cheat sheet and thought I would share it. Note: ABE recognizes a number of INCLUSION types. Internally, ABE maps its INCLUSION types to what are known as nsIContentPolicy types. The nsIContentPolicy types (which h...

You have me thinking I should try to rediscover some of the flash games I enjoyed, and grab the files. What are a few of your favorites?

OK, thanks. I went on to browse some source and figure out how to enable the debug logging and dumps. So I have a slightly better sense of it, but not by much.

I had a webRequest event logger running during NoScript 5.0.8.1rc1 testing in a fresh FF 54.0.1 portable on Win7. I saw webRequest events which indicated that some requests, which would not normally redirect, were being redirected to the same URL as was originally requested. Although the webRequest ...

Saw this in 5.0.8rc3: HTTPVERB : 'GET' | 'POST' | 'PUT' | 'PATCH' | 'DELETE'; (ABE.g line 46) Tried adding ABE rules with HEAD, TRACE, and OPTIONS (not accepted). New abe_rules.pdf says: 1.2 Methods The <method> component of a <predicate> can be any HTTP method (GET, POST, HEAD, PUT, DELETE, TRACE, ...

Therefore in RC3 I'm gonna update the current set of recognized INCLUDE(XYZ), with some convenience/compat aliases <snip> That is great news! A neat way of handling backward compat too. Looks like the bases are covered except for one thing: Would anyone want to address TYPE_IMAGE without also addre...

@barbaz: Thank you for recognizing the INC issue and starting this thread. @giorgio: Thanks for 5.08rc2 Much better, but now Deny INC(OTHER) no longer blocks Websocket connections. This both with and without e10s enabled. That would be a step in the right direction given that it is its own type: Chr...

I meant Cookie.js line #134 appears to have no effect. It is simply: 134: (c instanceof Ci.nsICookie) && (c instanceof Ci.nsICookie2); Is that a remnant of something or does it actually do something? I tried to see if noscript-2.9.5rc21.xpi has the same line but got a 404 for https://secure....

I'm starting to look around. Since it is related, mind if I put questions here? If you prefer elsewhere, feel free to move. 1) What's is the objective of Cookie.js line #134? 133: sameAs: function(c) { 134: (c instanceof Ci.nsICookie) && (c instanceof Ci.nsICookie2); 135: return Cookie.compu...

Saw some of these recently: “nsICookieManager2.add()” is changed. Update your code and pass the correct originAttributes. Read more on MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Reference/Interface/nsICookieManager2 Source was chrome://noscript/content/Cookie.js:120:21. I saw these w...

Looks like it would only affect surrogate script prefixed with < or > Maybe more: noscript.surrogate.obse.sources = @* noscript.surrogate.obse.replacement = function onBeforeScriptExecute(e) { if(e.target.src) { console.log("[obse] ExternalScript " + e.target.src); } else { console.log(&q...

Thanks Giorgio! File, line, column would sure make things easier to track down.

Yeah, why did I even say that out loud. FYI: Tracked my warnings for lines 6, 12, 14 down to Better Privacy (bprivacyprefs.js lines 4, 7, 8). It uses CRLF instead of LF so lineNum is incremented by 2 for each line.