Search found 9 matches

by rlaggren
Mon May 17, 2021 3:57 pm
Forum: Ragnarök
Topic: Google Drive & images on this forum (split from t=25643)
Replies: 5
Views: 16376

Re: Google Drive & images on this forum (split from t=25643)

My attempt above seems to be partially correct. To quote: --- I extracted the "id=..." from the link google drive provides and pasted it after the "id=..." in the following url: "https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=IMG-ID" --- This (with an image ID substitut...
by rlaggren
Sun May 16, 2021 4:06 am
Forum: Ragnarök
Topic: Google Drive & images on this forum (split from t=25643)
Replies: 5
Views: 16376

Re: Testers Wanted: NoScript UX Overhaul by Simply Secure

Oh my.

The images, which did display correctly initially, seem to have a half life of about 5 minutes. It's bed time. And time to bump up the priority for a new file sharing site.

Rufus
by rlaggren
Sun May 16, 2021 4:00 am
Forum: Ragnarök
Topic: Google Drive & images on this forum (split from t=25643)
Replies: 5
Views: 16376

Re: Testers Wanted: NoScript UX Overhaul by Simply Secure

Thx for the directions. It put me on the right path. I could not find a clickable way to display the image directly with the needed url appearing in the address box where I can copy it - at least not in Firefox. FYI if anybody else suffers this obstruction, here is what I did to get the final direct...
by rlaggren
Sat May 15, 2021 7:22 pm
Forum: Ragnarök
Topic: Google Drive & images on this forum (split from t=25643)
Replies: 5
Views: 16376

Google Drive & images on this forum (split from t=25643)

Ok. Images didn't take. Is there a review process or do I need to do something different?


Rufus
by rlaggren
Sat May 15, 2021 7:21 pm
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: Testers Wanted: NoScript UX Overhaul by Simply Secure
Replies: 42
Views: 46926

Re: Testers Wanted: NoScript UX Overhaul by Simply Secure

After reading finding an article on this on another site and then a link back to the original proposal, I left comments to the authors. But the "process" is a little unclear so I don't know if my thoughts will make it through. I think a gui face lift is a great idea because although I have...
by rlaggren
Mon Apr 20, 2020 3:40 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: XSS denial; after "top level...trusted", and "cascading", blank page
Replies: 7
Views: 7942

Re: XSS denial; after "top level...trusted", and "cascading", blank page

Thanks for the instant response. I am very glad to find a product like yours available to the "man in the street".

Hope all well with you folks.


Regards,
Rufus
by rlaggren
Sun Apr 19, 2020 7:37 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: XSS denial; after "top level...trusted", and "cascading", blank page
Replies: 7
Views: 7942

Re: XSS denial; after "top level...trusted", and "cascading", blank page

> ...do with xss denial... I clicked "ok" to deny. As it happens the above report is slightly wrong: The XSS denials did continue to pop up, but they did not display "on top" and thus I did not realize they had displayed. Only the first one displayed on top. I found 3 or 4 of the...
by rlaggren
Sun Apr 19, 2020 6:50 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: XSS denial; after "top level...trusted", and "cascading", blank page
Replies: 7
Views: 7942

XSS denial; after "top level...trusted", and "cascading", blank page

I've used Noscript for many years. Normally set top level trusted and cascading. I have just seen behavior I did not expect, the first time ever for Noscript. New install, led to some Noscript settings needing to be re-upped. But I don't think that actually relates. Just info. The _only_ Noscript se...
by rlaggren
Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:59 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: granular accept/deny w/ABE fails (denies always)
Replies: 4
Views: 2535

granular accept/deny w/ABE fails (denies always)

NS 2.6.9.15 browser Pale Moon 25.1.0 (Firefox fork) webpage w/problem: http://chicagoweathercenter.com/forecast I have allowed the main site and found it requires "gravatar.com"; I have allowed "gravatar.com" and the site works. I then added a user rule to ABE and the site failed...