Search found 5 matches
- Mon May 04, 2015 1:43 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Firefox hard freeze in js::irregexp::InterpretCode
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2072
Re: Firefox hard freeze in js::irregexp::InterpretCode
Yes, also confirmed on Firefox 37.0.2 with NoScript 2.6.9.22rc1.
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 4:06 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Firefox hard freeze in js::irregexp::InterpretCode
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2072
Re: Firefox hard freeze in js::irregexp::InterpretCode
No, I created a clean profile to repro.
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:40 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Firefox hard freeze in js::irregexp::InterpretCode
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2072
Firefox hard freeze in js::irregexp::InterpretCode
Hi, I've noticed an intranet site hard-freezes FireFox (39.0a2 Linux x86-64), and instead of just launching Chrome, today decided to investigate. By hard-freeze I mean it stops responding totally, I don't even get the "unresponsive script" dialog. A clean profile with no extensions doesn't...
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:42 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: Unable to exclude VPN site for SAML
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6327
Re: Unable to exclude VPN site for SAML
It all makes sense with your explanation of ruleset processing order, and I see that paragraph in the PDF now. Should that be included on https://noscript.net/abe too? I had the first rule in SYSTEM and the second in USER. What is the use for USER? Does it just get processed after SYSTEM? Working ru...
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:40 pm
- Forum: ABE
- Topic: Unable to exclude VPN site for SAML
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6327
Unable to exclude VPN site for SAML
My employer has started using some 3rd party sites to replace parts of the intranet, using SAML2 to authenticate against the domain. Since VPN addresses (10.../8) fall under LOCAL, they are restricted by the one default rule that comes with ABE. I don't see any way to make an exception for a specifi...