Search found 12 matches
- Sun Jul 19, 2015 8:26 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4070
Re: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
Whether anyone could come up with a use case for converting the request type but leaving the data, I don't know, but giving the option wouldn't hurt. The problem is that a website that's designed to take POST won't know what to do with GET data, and vice versa. It is not strictly the case that conv...
- Sun Jul 19, 2015 3:38 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4070
Re: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
It makes no sense to separate method & data - 1) sending empty POST data is useless and will break things, and 2) how can you send POST data in a GET request? It would make more sense to just have 3 sub-categories: HTTPAUTH, COOKIE, and REQ My best guess is that the URL rewriting I mentioned ab...
- Sat Jul 18, 2015 8:03 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4070
Re: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
If I were to submit a patch to add this feature, and presuming it met your standards, would you accept it? Based upon the specification (excerpt* below), the optional arguments would include such as the following (suggestions for alternative naming welcome): HTTPAUTH COOKIE METHOD DATA A user could ...
- Thu Oct 23, 2014 2:03 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: local ip detection flaw
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1633
Re: local ip detection flaw
Verified.
- Wed Oct 22, 2014 3:43 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: local ip detection flaw
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1633
local ip detection flaw
This bug applies to ABE (not sure if it's relevant anywhere else) ...
[Edit]
Redacted PoC, embargoed until the fix is deployed in the stable channel
[Edit]
Redacted PoC, embargoed until the fix is deployed in the stable channel
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 10:22 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: /rules.abe request does not respect user's ABE rules
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2300
Re: /rules.abe request does not respect user's ABE rules
I completely understand regarding prioritization. Thanks!
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:57 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: /rules.abe request does not respect user's ABE rules
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2300
Re: /rules.abe request does not respect user's ABE rules
To confirm that, is the cookie still set if you allow all 3rd-party cookies in the browser, then remove or comment out the Accept line in your rule? Yes, the cookie is still set.... FYI, the "working example" I put in my original post actually doesn't work unless you have HTTPS Everywhere...
- Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:20 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: /rules.abe request does not respect user's ABE rules
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2300
/rules.abe request does not respect user's ABE rules
Say that a user has the following rule in ABE: Site * Accept from SELF++ Anonymize Say that the user visits https://exampleONE.com with an image loaded from https://exampleTWO.com/image.jpg, and that image would normally set a cookie ... with the above rule set, the cookie is striped out. But (when ...
- Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:34 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: ABE Anonymize action replacing "??" with "?" in URL
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1842
ABE Anonymize action replacing "??" with "?" in URL
The ABE Anonymize action is replacing "??" with "?" in a URL, causing HTTP 400 Bad Request errors for requests from sites which load JavaScript and CSS from wp.com, if a rule such as follows is in effect: Site * Accept from SELF++ Anonymize This causes sites such as http://perspe...
- Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:16 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4070
ABE Anonymize action should accept optional arguments
Enhancement request ...
It would be useful if the Anonymize action were able to accept optional arguments in the same way that the INCLUSION method does. This would allow the user to specify for example that only cookies should be stripped from the request.
It would be useful if the Anonymize action were able to accept optional arguments in the same way that the INCLUSION method does. This would allow the user to specify for example that only cookies should be stripped from the request.
- Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:37 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: repeatedly requesting /rules.abe
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4689
Re: repeatedly requesting /rules.abe
I am reporting a bug. NoScript sends multiple requests for the same non-existent file during the course of a single page load.
- Wed Oct 01, 2014 3:07 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: repeatedly requesting /rules.abe
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4689
repeatedly requesting /rules.abe
Using a tool such as the Live HTTP Headers extension (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... p-headers/), and visiting such as the Wikipedia entry for NoScript (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoScript), you will see that NoScript will repeatedly request /rules.abe from bits.wikimedia.org ... thi...