InformAction Forums

Thanks for the consideration of those CDNs! I love NoScript and I think its great that you listen to your users for future updates. Especially the adding of http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com which has a lot of libraries the Google one doesn't like Modernizr, html5shiv, and Respond.js. They also host fonts...

NoScript prides itself on being free software, but then in return blocks a lot of it by default.

So the googleapis.com CDN is trusted just because it is Google? The developer seems to be very shortsighted in what is right and not. Yes, it is true that you can add sites to your whitelist, but there be some reconsideration on what is there by default.

These aren't standard, run of the mill CDNs. They specifically serve free software and open source compliant JavaScript libraries for a big portion of the internet. If this is a JavaScript extension and you can have the option to allow FLOSS JavaScript libraries, then what is big issue?

In the NoScript whitelist, you have the googleapis.com domain whitelisted which is helpful for accessing fonts and JavaScript on that domain normally since it is a trusted domain. With that in mind, there are a few other domains which serve open source JavaScript from their CDNs. They include: * aja...