InformAction Forums

When browsing Facebook, set Facebook sites to CUSTOM, then: - make sure the permissions listed for "ANY SITE" are what you want on non-Facebook sites; - change the "ANY SITE" dropdown to "...facebook.com" and individually allow the desired "additional" site-sp...

https://palant.info/2025/01/08/how-extensions-trick-cws-search/ I think I may have seen effects like this before when searching Chrome Web store. Guess this is another reason to prefer going to an extension's official homepage/repo to get (or cross-check) the link to that extension in the relevant ...

Workarounds: Turning off NoScript for the tab Generally this means solution is a matter of finding which specific additional permission(s) the site requires for the wanted functionality. (but then I have to watch ads -- NoScript is a security tool, not an adblocker. If you are looking to block ads,...

Moving to NoScript General

Could you respond to other inquiries as well please? I don't know all answers to all your questions, but can additionally help with these two - I am aware that it is not recommended to install filter-based extensions like uBO with NS Browser. False. Such setup *is* recommended here: NoScript for se...

I was trying to post the exact same thing properly here properly, but for some reason, I couldn't post it. It said the post was blocked due to anti-spam. You can private message the exact text you want to post to an active Support Team member and we will try to post it for you. PMs to forum staff a...

But until NS version 12 they did not appear. Can't do anything? Previous versions of NoScript were using Manifest V2 extensions APIs. NoScript 12 is using Manifest V3 extensions APIs, which are more limited and as Giorgio said in the other thread it's not possible to keep the previous approach that...

NoScript is completely unrelated and orthogonal to VPN. As such, it cannot work around issues caused by websites not playing well with using a VPN.

@barbaz, could not confirm. FF 115, NoScript 12.0.901 Weird, now I can't confirm this either? :? :shock: Same Firefox 133.0.3 / NoScript 12.0.901 combination is now behaving as expected, in both clean profile and my main profile. Guess this wasn't a NoScript issue even though I have no idea what ex...

Can confirm this. Monitoring network requests with the Browser Console (Ctrl-Shift-J) shows that updates for NoScript 12.0.901 are being checked against AMO instead of Giorgio's sites. Thanks DJ-Leith for the heads up, I'll keep an eye out to install manually when the next NoScript dev build is avai...

If JavaScript is blocked for a site, say information.com, if I have multiple tabs (pages) open to informaction.com, if I (Temporarily) Allow informaction.com in one of those tabs, if I jump to a different informaction.com tab, should that tab, the NoScript icon, reflect that informaction.com is All...

This forum. Allow informaction.com - with that "icons" appear Revoke - with that icons still appear You have to do a hard refresh on the page to make the icons go away. That's expected behavior. The webfont providing those icons has been cached and is being loaded entirely from cache. No ...

Maybe you can change the message level of your `[Report Only]` debug in Chrome to info or warning, better than error. Those messages look to be coming from Chromium, not NoScript, in which case NoScript wouldn't have control over them. These messages appear by the hundreds, making it impossible to ...

NoScript 12.0.901 Firefox 133.0.3 new profile STR: 1) visit any site that behaves visibly differently when a site is allowed vs when it's not allowed, e.g. https://maone.net/ 2) NoScript popup > set maone.net to (Temp.) Trusted 3) close NoScript popup by clicking off of it Expected results: webpage ...

Thanks Giorgio for the fix! Not sure why that type of issue didn't reproduce in a clean profile Anyway 12.0.901 fixed this error in my main profile.