InformAction Forums

permit me to make the general observation that Noscript will not in the future be creating its own allow list in the similar manner as Sponsor Block. Is that a fair analysis of what I might expect ? Yes. NoScript leaves it up to the user to decide whether & why a site is trusted, untrusted, or ...

@Surender Dorothy see the sticky - viewtopic.php?t=7688
also see viewtopic.php?t=26521

I asked this for a reason: For what purpose(s) did you install NoScript? You seem to be focusing on blocking tracking scripts and possibly also blocking advertising. Thinking that NoScript can serve these purposes is not an uncommon misconception, but it seems to have suddenly become much more preva...

What if we remove the technical stuff and just try to convey the basic information? "Automatically trust sites loaded as the top level document" This could work, though not sure if it'd still have potential to be misinterpreted as setting permanent permissions. https://i.psyche.me/thinkin...

NoScript does not have the functionality you're seeking, sorry.

To be able to answer your other questions: For what purpose(s) did you install NoScript?

1. We don't apply neither the "TRUSTED" nor the "Temp. TRUSTED" presets anymore: instead we create and apply a CUSTOM capabilities set which matches the current TRUST preset, but is temporary and contextual to the top domain. This reasoning seems too focused on technical impleme...

Personally, I prefer "Automatically set top-level sites to Temp.TRUSTED" +1. Or to be sharper, "Automatically set top-level sites to contextually Temp.TRUSTED" A tooltip "When restarting the browser, the checkbox will remain checked and permissions for top-level sites will ...

Recently ran across a number of signs indicating that Firefox repos are being transitioned away from hg.mozilla.org and moving to https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox , possibly as soon as the next release cycle. Is this true? If so, do I have the correct link for the new Firefox source code r...

barbaz wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 3:00 pm 12.5.904 now shows the "x-load" permission for "file:" in NoScript Options > Per-site Permissions , but enabling it there doesn't seem to have any effect?

In 12.5.905 this works. Thanks Giorgio!

12.5.904 now shows the "x-load" permission for "file:" in NoScript Options > Per-site Permissions 👍 , but enabling it there doesn't seem to have any effect? Before posting this thread, in NoScript 12.5.903 I also tried setting this permission manually for "file:", and t...

Much better, now it even uses less CPU than with the previous working NoScript version. Thanks for the fast fix!

So, if file:/// saved from example.com. is open and it wants to load active content from notexample.com, then the "x-load" checkbox should appear in file: -> CUSTOM with the tooltip: "Capability for ‹…› directory." More like if you open "file:///home/fatboy/Downloads/somepa...

NoScript 12.5.x introduced a new "x-load" capability that is disabled by default for file: URLs. Since I consider all local files as trusted, I would like to enable x-load for all file: URLs. How to do this?

NoScript 12.5.902 Firefox 137.0.2 new profile I have the Rust documentation locally installed. When viewing this local copy of the Rust documentation, Firefox's file:// content process continuously uses a lot of CPU and continuously consumes more and more RAM. The Firefox tab indefinitely shows the ...

can I pm you to verify the email address is I used is correct? I don't expect you to tell me what the email address is, just to confirm it is the same one I thought I used. PM requires login, so this wouldn't be possible until after your account is working The correct email address is (first name) ...