InformAction Forums

barbaz wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 3:00 pm 12.5.904 now shows the "x-load" permission for "file:" in NoScript Options > Per-site Permissions , but enabling it there doesn't seem to have any effect?

In 12.5.905 this works. Thanks Giorgio!

12.5.904 now shows the "x-load" permission for "file:" in NoScript Options > Per-site Permissions 👍 , but enabling it there doesn't seem to have any effect? Before posting this thread, in NoScript 12.5.903 I also tried setting this permission manually for "file:", and t...

Much better, now it even uses less CPU than with the previous working NoScript version. Thanks for the fast fix!

So, if file:/// saved from example.com. is open and it wants to load active content from notexample.com, then the "x-load" checkbox should appear in file: -> CUSTOM with the tooltip: "Capability for ‹…› directory." More like if you open "file:///home/fatboy/Downloads/somepa...

NoScript 12.5.x introduced a new "x-load" capability that is disabled by default for file: URLs. Since I consider all local files as trusted, I would like to enable x-load for all file: URLs. How to do this?

NoScript 12.5.902 Firefox 137.0.2 new profile I have the Rust documentation locally installed. When viewing this local copy of the Rust documentation, Firefox's file:// content process continuously uses a lot of CPU and continuously consumes more and more RAM. The Firefox tab indefinitely shows the ...

can I pm you to verify the email address is I used is correct? I don't expect you to tell me what the email address is, just to confirm it is the same one I thought I used. PM requires login, so this wouldn't be possible until after your account is working The correct email address is (first name) ...

Only Giorgio might be able to help from here. He hasn't been around the forums much lately, so you might try contacting him through one of the methods listed at https://maone.net/

Emails from this forum come from

If somerandomsite.com and wallstdata.com are allowed to run scripts on a mybroker.com webpage, their scripts run in the context of the mybroker.com webpage , so any "fetch" they initiate would look the same as a fetch initiated by mybroker.com's first-party scripts. What you're describing ...

I have clicked on the "Disable on this tab" option, and just got on with things at the time. If that worked, then you are not experiencing the type of problem discussed in this thread. When you have more details of the issue you are experiencing, please start a new thread, also making sur...

What I discovered was once I selected the following Firefox settings: Privacy & Security/History (Use custom settings for history)/Clear history when Firefox closes/Settings/Temporary cached files and pages, that when I restarted Firefox without an internet connection/blocked by the firewall th...

Elmbeard, your issue sounds very different from the one discussed in this thread: The recommended browser for OSX 10.6 is Interweb, which is based on Firefox 55. Actually, looks like Interweb is based on a fork of UXP/Goanna (which yes some versions are in turn Firefox 55 based). Last I checked, UXP...

This is not normal and would not be controlled by NoScript. Not sure if what follows is relevant, but since your issue started after a reinstall: I have previously seen where some, but not all, addons would be displayed with blank icons in about:addons after copying my Firefox profile to another sys...

Apoxode wrote: ↑Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:40 pm I understand this topic is marked as resolved,

Split these posts to a new thread so this issue can get its own proper attention. The issue in the other thread involved similar symptoms, but the cause was different - this new issue is more widespread and is not resolved.