InformAction Forums

From https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=5920 - noscript.removeSMILKeySniffer - Protection against scriptless keylogging using SMIL animation elements that are triggered by keystrokes. Doing a grep through NoScript 5.1.9rc1, the ONLY instance of "removeSMILKeySniffer" is the pref li...

You mean "top-level site". The TLD in your example would be "com"! Do you want this button to allow the top-level site's "Base 2nd-level Domain" or its "Full Domain"? You might want to edit your post and topic title to better reflect what you actually mean, so that your suggestion doesn't look horri...

@sprocketoctopus Remember to log in before posting so that you can use your chosen username and don't need to repeatedly solve the CAPTCHA each time. (I've fixed your post above) You can just use as-is the suggested UA string for "general.useragent.override.google.com". There should be no need to al...

Threads merged.

therube wrote: ↑

Fri May 24, 2019 4:01 pm

And concepts of "profiles" & "sessions" & "instances" & "installs" & "-no-remote" & "dde"... have changed with 67, Firefox 67, multiple user profiles)

This deserves its own thread IMO, and is unrelated to the userChrome/userContent.css change.

But IIUC only for users who don't already use them.

https://www.ghacks.net/2019/05/24/firef ... y-default/

Why is this person trying to install NoScript 5.1.8.4?

Please ask them to try installing latest NoScript Classic from https://noscript.net/getit (5.1.9 at time of writing), and if that doesn't work for them, please ask them to post here directly for further assistance.

Totally irrelevant drivel. You didn't even bother to read the links before posting, did you?

Locking and binning as off-topic.

chrispeddler, did you even read the article before posting here?

If you click the NS icon, what do you get?

Does this issue occur in a new, clean Firefox profile?

bernie wrote: ↑

Mon May 20, 2019 1:13 am

I can't figure out if it my browser is always running JS or if something else has blocked JS

Go to https://enable-javascript.com/, what does it say about status of Javascript in your browser?

They should be equally effective. NoScript for Chromium just has fewer features, e.g. missing XSS filter, because Chromium has more limited WebExtensions APIs than Firefox.

NoScript 10 stores its data through chrome.storage.sync API, which uses storage-sync.sqlite as its backend. The storage.js was the old backend of chrome.storage.local , which IIRC NoScript falls back to if chrome.storage.sync is not available. Starting with Firefox 66, chrome.storage.local is migrat...

barbaz wrote: ↑

Sat May 18, 2019 8:46 pm

Now I need to find replacement for Ci.nsIDOMDocument.

I'm trying replacing it with Document for now.

Also ran into and had to fix https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/959 for NoScript.

Looks like I will need to also write a document.loadOverlay replacement.

I solved that error. MDN documentation of __defineGetter__ is misleading. It appears to claim that obj.__defineGetter__('foo', function(){/* ... */}); is equivalent to Object.defineProperty(obj, 'foo', {get:function(){/* ... */}}); But this is incorrect. Getters set with __defineGetter__ are configu...

+1

Moving RFE to NoScript Development.