Search found 8007 matches

by barbaz
Mon May 27, 2019 1:29 am
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: (classic) Does "removeSMILKeySniffer" feature still exist?
Replies: 1
Views: 22

(classic) Does "removeSMILKeySniffer" feature still exist?

From https://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=5920 - noscript.removeSMILKeySniffer - Protection against scriptless keylogging using SMIL animation elements that are triggered by keystrokes. Doing a grep through NoScript 5.1.9rc1, the ONLY instance of "removeSMILKeySniffer" is the pref li...
by barbaz
Sun May 26, 2019 2:38 pm
Forum: NoScript Development
Topic: RFE: TLS Button
Replies: 2
Views: 48

Re: RFE: TLD Button

You mean "top-level site". The TLD in your example would be "com"! Do you want this button to allow the top-level site's "Base 2nd-level Domain" or its "Full Domain"? You might want to edit your post and topic title to better reflect what you actually mean, so that your suggestion doesn't look horri...
by barbaz
Sun May 26, 2019 2:56 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: google search results displaying in mobile mode with Noscript, despite being on desktop
Replies: 27
Views: 287

Re: google search results displaying in mobile mode with Noscript, despite being on desktop

@sprocketoctopus Remember to log in before posting so that you can use your chosen username and don't need to repeatedly solve the CAPTCHA each time. (I've fixed your post above) You can just use as-is the suggested UA string for "general.useragent.override.google.com". There should be no need to al...
by barbaz
Fri May 24, 2019 7:54 pm
Forum: Web Tech
Topic: userChrome.css and userContent.css to be disabled by default
Replies: 2
Views: 43

Re: userChrome.css and userContent.css to be disabled by default

therube wrote:
Fri May 24, 2019 4:01 pm
And concepts of "profiles" & "sessions" & "instances" & "installs" & "-no-remote" & "dde"... have changed with 67, Firefox 67, multiple user profiles)
This deserves its own thread IMO, and is unrelated to the userChrome/userContent.css change.
by barbaz
Wed May 22, 2019 8:43 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: [RESOLVED] Unable to install NS to Waterfox
Replies: 3
Views: 81

Re: Unable to install NS to Waterfox

Why is this person trying to install NoScript 5.1.8.4?

Please ask them to try installing latest NoScript Classic from https://noscript.net/getit (5.1.9 at time of writing), and if that doesn't work for them, please ask them to post here directly for further assistance.
by barbaz
Tue May 21, 2019 3:18 pm
Forum: Ragnarök
Topic: totally irrelevant - split from t=25493
Replies: 1
Views: 42

Re: totally irrelevant - split from t=25493

Totally irrelevant drivel. You didn't even bother to read the links before posting, did you?

Locking and binning as off-topic.
by barbaz
Tue May 21, 2019 3:09 pm
Forum: Security
Topic: Major browsers to block some plain-HTTP downloads on HTTPS sites
Replies: 3
Views: 293

Re: Major browsers to block some plain-HTTP downloads on HTTPS sites

chrispeddler, did you even read the article before posting here?
by barbaz
Mon May 20, 2019 3:38 am
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Question mark *always* on NS icon
Replies: 2
Views: 77

Re: Question mark *always* on NS icon

If you click the NS icon, what do you get?

Does this issue occur in a new, clean Firefox profile?
bernie wrote:
Mon May 20, 2019 1:13 am
I can't figure out if it my browser is always running JS or if something else has blocked JS
Go to https://enable-javascript.com/, what does it say about status of Javascript in your browser?
by barbaz
Sun May 19, 2019 5:05 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Where are NoScript options?
Replies: 14
Views: 200

Re: Where are NoScript options?

They should be equally effective. NoScript for Chromium just has fewer features, e.g. missing XSS filter, because Chromium has more limited WebExtensions APIs than Firefox.
by barbaz
Sun May 19, 2019 2:49 pm
Forum: NoScript Support
Topic: Where are NoScript options?
Replies: 14
Views: 200

Re: Where are NoScript options?

NoScript 10 stores its data through chrome.storage.sync API, which uses storage-sync.sqlite as its backend. The storage.js was the old backend of chrome.storage.local , which IIRC NoScript falls back to if chrome.storage.sync is not available. Starting with Firefox 66, chrome.storage.local is migrat...
by barbaz
Sat May 18, 2019 9:45 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Classic and Waterfox 68?
Replies: 7
Views: 551

Re: NoScript Classic and Waterfox 68?

barbaz wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 8:46 pm
Now I need to find replacement for Ci.nsIDOMDocument.
I'm trying replacing it with Document for now.

Also ran into and had to fix https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/959 for NoScript.

Looks like I will need to also write a document.loadOverlay replacement.
by barbaz
Sat May 18, 2019 8:46 pm
Forum: NoScript General
Topic: NoScript Classic and Waterfox 68?
Replies: 7
Views: 551

Re: NoScript Classic and Waterfox 68?

I solved that error. MDN documentation of __defineGetter__ is misleading. It appears to claim that obj.__defineGetter__('foo', function(){/* ... */}); is equivalent to Object.defineProperty(obj, 'foo', {get:function(){/* ... */}}); But this is incorrect. Getters set with __defineGetter__ are configu...