InformAction Forums

And all this "ns5 was so intuitive" talk is just factually not true. Really? Let's see your facts. Here's a fact — I never visited this forum, saw a manual, did anything with NoScript prior to 10.x but use it. I'm betting I was the rule, not the exception. I think the level of traffic her...

I remembered the Internet Archive, and some messing around finally led me to https://secure.informaction.com/downloa ... -5.1.7.xpi.

The combination of FF 57 and NoScript 10 is a mess. I don't know whether that's mostly a Mozilla problem or mostly a NoScript problem, but either way, it's unusable. I've gone back to FF 52 ESR, but now the only NoScript available in Extensions is the new one. I looked around for links to the old ve...

Ditto. I don't understand the new UI at all.

In addition to what nz51t noted, where is the difference between enabling a site temporarily or permanently?

And, at least on OS X (10.12.6), the close button on the NoScript dialog is a giant red question mark.

Good grief. My wife calls this Male Pattern Blindness. The icon was someplace I had never seen it, didn't expect it, and therefore didn't notice it — at the top of the FF window, directly to the left of the location bar. I dragged it back to the Customize window, and then down to the status bar, and...

FF4b9, NoScript 2.0.9.3, running on OS X 10.6.6. Under FF3, the NoScript S icon appears in the status bar at all times. When there are one or more blocks, there is also yellow line above the status bar that shows "Scripts Currently Forbidden" and has the "Option" button at the fa...