Search found 9 matches
- Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:22 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: [MOOT] XSUH & noscript
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2396
Re: XSUH & noscript
hm... looks my fault. sorry.
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:33 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: [MOOT] XSUH & noscript
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2396
[MOOT] XSUH & noscript
Hello!
Just want to know why nosc doesn't help in this case?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568564
Just want to know why nosc doesn't help in this case?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568564
- Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:05 am
- Forum: Security
- Topic: You need two to tango - host and browser- CSP!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8520
Re: You need two to tango - host and browser- CSP!
I was told in ABE thread, that CAPS gone for performance reasons.
rip
rip
- Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:03 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Discussion: Site Specific Permissions Policy
- Replies: 165
- Views: 114884
Re: Discussion: Site Specific Permissions Policy
damn. thanks for comment.
- Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:22 pm
- Forum: Security
- Topic: You need two to tango - host and browser- CSP!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8520
Re: You need two to tango - host and browser- CSP!
I dont think CSP is salvation in the form its planned to realise.
With CAPS it could be made decades ago. nothing else.
If we had a GUI for CAPS more ppl around could use w/o damage for 'emselves.
With CAPS it could be made decades ago. nothing else.
If we had a GUI for CAPS more ppl around could use w/o damage for 'emselves.
- Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:29 am
- Forum: Security
- Topic: You need two to tango - host and browser- CSP!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8520
Re: You need two to tango - host and browser- CSP!
what happened to CAPS?
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:51 am
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Discussion: Site Specific Permissions Policy
- Replies: 165
- Views: 114884
Re: Discussion: Site Specific Permissions Policy
Hello! Could I have a suggestion on my vision of Permissions Policies. NS good addition, but unfortunately its approach to problem doesn't provide flexibility. It copies MSIE concept of security zones... Not using much CAPS concept that already Mozilla has. It would be right to give user opportunity...
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:39 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: [CLOSED] Mozz caps (security policies)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2248
Re: Mozz caps (security policies)
Thanks. I will continue in http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=415
- Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:45 am
- Forum: NoScript General
- Topic: [CLOSED] Mozz caps (security policies)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2248
[CLOSED] Mozz caps (security policies)
Hello! Really noscript is better than nothing, but, imo, its not flexible enough. In fact ns allows to block things than its authors consider as unsafe. But if you look at Mozilla CAPS http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/components/ConfigPolicy.html you can see that it has flexible mechanism to...