InformAction Forums

Have you tried using multiple regexes in the Site expression? Site ^https?://192\.168\.76\.10[0-9]:8888(/.*)? ^https?://xxx\.yyy\.zzz\.aa[0-9]:8888(/.*)? ^https?://eee\.fff\.ggg\.hh[0-9]:8888(/.*)? Accept GET OPTIONS from web.airdroid.com Accept from LOCAL Deny No, I haven't, and hadn't realized a ...

@Giorgio: It would be much appreciated if there were a way to specify a regular expression <resource> utilizing a token of some kind to represent a generic local network. Specifying the subnet explicitly as I have done means that a simple rule will not work for multiple offices. I'm not sure what y...

Ah. Looks like GET is not enough. How interesting; I'd never before seen a website actually use the HTTP OPTIONS method. However, it's supported in ABE. Please change the 'Accept GET from web.airdroid.com' to simply 'Accept from web.airdroid.com' (to accept all HTTP methods). Much thanks, Thrawn, t...

I spoke too soon. ABE is still getting in my way for some things in AirDroid. From the Error Console I see this sort of thing when trying to upload a file using AirDroid: [ABE] <^https?://192\.168\.76\.10[0-9]:8888/?.*> Deny on {OPTIONS http://192.168.76.105:8888/sdctl/comm/upload/dir?7bb=8a8a8a8a8a...

Hmm...looks like there is indeed an ABE issue. Maybe kalhimeo still has ABE disabled? That is a distinct possibility. Prior to looking for help in this thread, I sampled eight different Firefox profiles on the subject of ABE settings and found one of them with ABE disabled. Since the user in questi...

Is it possible to solve this problem by adding some kind of ruleset to noscript.ABE.rulesets.USER instead of using noscript.inclusionTypeChecking.exceptions ? I ask because I found this posting which claims something similar. In short: no. The feature that is firing here is completely separate to A...

As Giorgio has previously advised in a similar situation , you'll need to add d3kw9cbwoqg2ak.cloudfront.net to your noscript.inclusionTypeChecking.exceptions about:config preference (space-separated). Is it possible to solve this problem by adding some kind of ruleset to noscript.ABE.rulesets.USER ...